本研究聚焦J. S. Bruner於1945-1972年間的認知研究發展，並依其所發表之作品為文獻分析基礎，嘗試從教育理論的視野出發，建構一套以「認知」、「發展」與「教育」為核心向度的研究分類架構，以梳理Bruner各時期著作之整體脈絡與理論連貫性。研究結果顯示，Bruner早期即專注於知覺與思考歷程的探究，並以此作為改進教育實務與推動教育改革的重要理論基礎，其間亦持續將心理學研究成果轉化為教育理論資源。在理論內涵方面，Bruner的教育思維可歸納為以下要點：知覺乃一種主動建構的活動；思考涉及資訊的選擇與轉換；技能的展現源於行為模組的協調運作；表徵系統之轉換有助於智力發展；個體在知識獲取過程中扮演主動角色；課程設計應回應學習者的表徵模式；教育則構成文化增強與社會創新的基石。進一步而言，Bruner的認知理論對教育實務具有多項啟示，包括肯認人類心智的主動性、拓展思考與學習關係的理解視野、奠定問題導向學習與螺旋式課程的理論基礎，並強調課程與教學設計需配合學生的知識建構歷程。同時，認知表徵研究亦有助於教材設計與學習潛能的開展，並支援以學生表徵模式組織課程教學，從而樂觀看待學科知識的可教性。整體而言，Bruner的認知理論亦提供了理解教育在文化傳承與社會創新中角色的重要理論視角。

This study examines the historical development and educational-theoretical foundations of Jerome S. Bruner’s cognitive theory between 1945 and 1972. Using Jeremy M. Anglin’s edited volume Beyond the Information Given: Studies in the Psychology of Knowing (1973) as the primary corpus for textual analysis, the study reconstructs the internal coherence and progression of Bruner’s writings across this formative period. Rather than offering a historiography of cognitive psychology, the research adopts an educational-theoretical perspective to clarify how Bruner’s cognitive research was progressively articulated as a coherent theory of education. To this end, the study employs a tripartite analytical framework– cognition, development, and education– to trace the continuity and transformation of Bruner’s theoretical insights and to specify their implications for curriculum theory, pedagogy, and educational reform. By integrating close textual analysis with biographical and contextual information, the study highlights the reciprocal influence between Bruner’s psychological theorizing and his evolving educational commitments.

Bruner’s early work emerged as a substantive challenge to the behaviorist paradigm that dominated mid-twentieth-century American psychology. In contrast to behaviorism’s emphasis on observable stimulus– response mechanisms, Bruner conceptualized perception as an active and interpretive process shaped by internal values, expectations, and needs. His research in perception (including collaborative work with Cecile Goodman and Leo Postman) demonstrated that individuals do not simply register sensory input but organize and reinterpret stimuli in ways that preserve cognitive coherence. Studies such as “Value and Need as Organizing Factors in Perception” (1947) and “On the Perception of Incongruity” (1949) illustrated how meaning, motivation, and expectation function as organizing factors in perception. These early findings provided a conceptual foundation for Bruner’s broader rejection of reductionist learning models and contributed to the “New Look” movement in cognitive psychology, thereby establishing a view of mind that foregrounded agency, interpretation, and intention.

Building on this foundation, Bruner developed a more systematic account of thinking and concept formation that further displaced mechanistic accounts of learning. In A Study of Thinking (1956), co-authored with Jacqueline Goodnow and George Austin, Bruner framed conceptualization as a sequence of decisions involving categorization, hypothesis testing, and information reduction. He argued that concept acquisition is not a simple function of stimulus–response conditioning but a creative and goal-directed problem-solving activity shaped by constraints and purposes. In the intellectual context of the cognitive revolution, this work positioned Bruner alongside major figures such as George A. Miller, Noam Chomsky, and Herbert Simon, while also carrying clear educational implications: if thinking is active, strategic, and constructive, then educational environments must be designed to cultivate inquiry, decision-making, and conceptual exploration rather than mere reinforcement.

A unifying theme of Bruner’s cognitive theory is captured in his notion of “going beyond the information given.” For Bruner, the mind does not merely process incoming data; it actively constructs meaning through inference, analogy, and abstraction. This constructivist orientation informed his later investigations into representation and symbolic functioning. He proposed three primary modes of representation– enactive (action-based), iconic (image-based), and symbolic (language-based)– through which individuals encode, reorganize, and transform experience. Although often discussed in developmental terms, these representational modes function in Bruner’s work as interrelated cognitive resources: each mode offers distinct affordances for thinking and learning, and their coordination provides a framework for understanding both intellectual development and instructional design.

From a developmental perspective, Bruner argued that intellectual growth involves the progressive mastery, integration, and transformation of representational systems. His studies of children’s learning processes emphasized the role of symbolic representation in supporting abstract reasoning and complex problem solving, while also underscoring the continuity between early sensorimotor experience and later cognitive competence. His work on skill acquisition– exemplified in “Competence in Infants” (1971)– showed that seemingly basic behaviors (e.g., grasping or gazing) are structured by intention, feedback, and hierarchical sequencing. These findings reinforced Bruner’s broader claim that learning is an active developmental process and challenged rigid separations between “basic” and “advanced” cognition. Educationally, this suggests that instruction must attend to learners’ current representational capacities while also providing conditions for their transformation through guided participation and increasingly complex intellectual tasks.

The educational implications of Bruner’s theory were most explicitly articulated in The Process of Education (1960), which synthesized insights from the 1959 Woods Hole Conference on curriculum reform. Bruner advocated reorganizing school curricula around the fundamental ideas and structures of disciplines, arguing that deep understanding depends on grasping underlying conceptual patterns rather than accumulating disconnected facts. He introduced the spiral curriculum as a model in which central ideas are revisited at increasing levels of complexity, thereby linking curriculum progression to learners’ developing representational resources. A central claim in this framework is that any subject can be taught to any child in some intellectually honest form, provided that instruction is aligned with the learner’s current mode of representation. Readiness for learning, in this view, is not a fixed prerequisite but a developmental and representational relation between learners, content, and instructional mediation.

Bruner further advanced discovery learning as a pedagogical orientation grounded in the learner’s active construction of knowledge. Discovery learning posits that students learn most effectively when they engage in inquiry, generate hypotheses, test interpretations, and draw conclusions based on evidence. This orientation was operationalized in the interdisciplinary curriculum Man: A Course of Study (MACOS), which explored what it means to be human through anthropology, sociology, and biology and incorporated multimedia resources, fieldwork activities, and ethical discussion. In educational-theoretical terms, MACOS exemplifies Bruner’s commitment to curriculum as an intellectual and moral practice: the learner is positioned not as a recipient of finalized knowledge but as an inquirer whose understanding is shaped through structured encounters with evidence, interpretation, and competing perspectives.

In the 1960s and early 1970s, Bruner increasingly emphasized the cultural dimensions of cognition and education. He argued that schools function as “cultural amplifiers,” transmitting symbolic tools– such as language, mathematics, and narrative– that extend human cognitive potential. Education thus involves not only knowledge transmission but the transformation of learners’ relationships to knowledge and society. Bruner distinguished between context-free models of mind, which seek universal cognitive structures, and context-sensitive models, which attend to how cultural practices, institutional arrangements, and social values shape learning. Empirical support for this cultural perspective appeared in cross-cultural research (including work with Patricia Greenfield in Senegal), suggesting that schooling can foster metacognitive awareness and abstract reasoning across cultural contexts. Bruner’s involvement in early childhood initiatives such as Head Start further reflected an educational commitment to designing enriched learning environments that support cognitive and emotional development, especially for disadvantaged children, and that connect educational opportunity with broader ideals of participation and equity.

Bruner’s later writings extended these concerns through an emphasis on narrative as a fundamental mode of knowing. He argued that human beings organize experience and identity through storytelling, and that narrative cognition enables meaning-making in ways that complement logical-scientific forms of thought. This narrative perspective broadened the educational significance of his cognitive theory by underscoring interpretation, context, and cultural continuity as central to learning. It also anticipated later developments in cultural psychology and educational research, contributing theoretical resources for contemporary discussions of curriculum, literacy, and identity formation.

In conclusion, this study argues that Bruner’s cognitive theory (1945-1972) is best understood as a coherent educational theory integrating cognition, development, culture, and pedagogy. By reconceptualizing learners as active, intentional, and culturally embedded agents, Bruner offered a robust foundation for developmental curriculum design, discovery-oriented pedagogy, and an educational vision attentive to symbolic mediation and cultural practice. His work challenged reductive models of learning, foregrounded the role of representation and inquiry, and affirmed the transformative potential of education in shaping human development and social innovation. Reconstructing Bruner’s cognitive theory from an educational-theoretical perspective therefore provides enduring conceptual resources for educational research and offers a clarified understanding of the intellectual foundations of modern educational thought.