高等教育出版
熱門: 吳清山  吳勁甫  廖年淼  花茂棽  陳心怡  LTE-V2V  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文  購買本期
篇名
臺灣高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標之研究   免費試閱
並列篇名
A Study of Quality Assurance Indicators of Higher Technical and Vocational Education in Taiwan
作者 于承平胡茹萍
中文摘要
自從技專校院辦理綜合評鑑以來,業已達成評等優劣、發掘問題、導引方向、督促改進及輔導建議等功能,惟仍存在著評鑑標準一致化、限制各校特色發展、為爭取評鑑成績致資源錯置等問題,故為強化評鑑優點並改善不足之處,進而採行認可制評鑑,該項政策推動如何能更為精進並納入品質保證作法,實值得探討與改進。本研究先以文獻分析,釐清認可制評鑑與品質保證關係,明確凸顯問題分析重點,另分別就澳洲及歐盟技職教育品質保證發展、臺灣訓練品質評核系統及技專校院認可制評鑑等現況進行探討,呈現分析對象完整全貌,並就研究分析結果提出臺灣高等技術及職業教育品質保證指標初步概念架構。其次,運用專家訪談、專家效度問卷、模糊德懷術及層級分析法進行57人次學者專家訪談及調查分析,完成建構包含四項構面、20項主指標及76項次指標之臺灣高級技術及職業教育品質保證指標架構及權重體系,最後配合研究結果與討論,分別提出相關建議。
英文摘要
Ever since the comprehensive evaluation system was implemented for technical and vocational colleges and universities in Taiwan, it has functioned to better discriminate between schools, discover existing problems, guide future directions, supervise schools for making improvements, and offer consultations and suggestions. Nonetheless, there remain problems such as homogeneity of evaluative standard that limits schools to develop their own special characteristics, as well as sole concerns of schools to achieve better evaluative standards that result in displacements of school resources. As a result, accreditation was implemented in order to maintain merits of current evaluative system and improve upon its loopholes. Nevertheless, how to further polish the related policy and incorporate quality assurance into its mechanism is little explored and thus addressed in this paper. By employing literature review as a means of delineating the relationships between accreditation and quality assurance, and further highlighting points of problems during analysis, this study analyzed respective developments of TVE (Technical and Vocational Education) Systems within both Australia and the European Union, in order to explore how policies are implemented within vertical hierarchy of institutions, and how theses have evolved over horizontal time pattern, so that the whole picture of each evaluation system might be revealed. This study eventually contributed to provision of a conceptual framework of quality assurance indicators for technical and vocational education in Taiwan. Furthermore, by adopting in-depth interviews, expert validation questionnaire, fuzzy Delphi technique questionnaire, and hierarchical analysis, this study also conducted 57 persons/times interviews with scholars and professionals, and made surveillance and analyses thereafter, in order to complete the construction of a framework and a weighting system of quality assurance for higher technical and vocational education in Taiwan. Finally, this study proposed several suggestions for the reference of related authorities, universities and colleges.
起訖頁 071-105
關鍵詞 品質保證指標高等技術及職業教育認可制評鑑quality assuranceindicatorhigher technical and vocational educationaccreditation
刊名 教育政策論壇  
期數 201702 (20:1期)
出版單位 國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所
DOI 10.3966/156082982017022001003  複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
析論影響英國「國際學校獎」實施之因素:政策執行的觀點
該期刊
下一篇
大學生的基本權保障與限制:以學習自由為核心

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500