「臺灣中小學輔導教師專業職能量表」之量表建構與現況初探,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 刘安  Zhiwen Cheng  王美玲  朱丽彬  曾瓊瑤  黃光男  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 大陸/海外期刊 政府機關 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 DOI查詢服務 DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文   購買本期
篇名
「臺灣中小學輔導教師專業職能量表」之量表建構與現況初探
並列篇名
The Development of Professional Competence Scale for Guidance Teachers in Taiwanese Primary and Secondary Schools
作者 宋呈澔李佩珊吳佳純
中文摘要
本研究旨在建構並驗證「臺灣中小學輔導教師專業職能量表」,進而初步探究現今輔導教師專業職能展現狀況,以作為未來培訓增能參考依據。研究對象為401名國高中小輔導教師(男性68人,17.0%;女性333人,83.0%),年齡介於22至60歲,平均33歲(SD=7.67)。研究工具包含五構念:「自我覺察與專業成長(SAP)」6題、「支持與建構輔導工作(SCG)」7題、「學校本位輔導工作(SBG)」8題、「個案本位輔導工作(CBG)」10題、「系統連結與合作(SCC)」8題,共39題。本研究運用心理計量特性分析與試題反應理論檢驗量表品質,結果顯示,全量表整體內部一致性為.96,驗證性因素分析適配度指標CFI為 .959、RMSEA為 .057,顯示具有良好的信效度。此外,量表與「施為參與」呈顯著正相關,具有效標關聯效度。在試題反應理論分析中,量表各題項與模式適配度均合理且無DIF現象,顯示測量具公平性。群體差異分析之比較結果顯示,不論背景,輔導教師皆認同這些職能的重要性。本研究認為此量表能廣泛應用於輔導教師培育與訓練,並作為專業職能評估之重要依據。
英文摘要

Research Motivation and Purpose. In response to the evolving complexity of student issues and the institutional reforms of school guidance systems in Taiwan, this study aimed to develop and validate the “Professional Competence Scale for School Guidance Teachers in Taiwan.” The research was conducted within the policy context of the 2024 revision of the Student Guidance and Counseling Act, which marked the first major reform since the law’s enactment in 2014. The revised act emphasized the best interest of the child, the expansion of full-time guidance teacher positions, and clarified the three-tiered model of developmental, intervention, and treatment-level counseling. These reforms underscored the need to clearly define and assess the professional competencies of school guidance teachers (SGTs), ensuring consistency in training, evaluation, and service delivery across the national school system.

Literature Review. Although international frameworks such as the ASCA National Model (2003, 2019a) have systematically articulated school counselor competencies, Taiwan lacks a validated, large-scale instrument rooted in its own educational and cultural context. Previous local efforts, such as the Delphi study conducted by Lee & Sung (2022), developed a preliminary set of indicators based on expert consensus. However, these indicators had yet to be subjected to empirical psychometric testing. Furthermore, while guidance teachers play a crucial role in addressing issues such as dropout prevention, school bullying, crisis response, and adolescent mental health, their professional identity and perceived role boundaries remain ambiguous in practice. A validated competence scale would offer a foundation for strengthening their roles and aligning their services with current educational goals.

Methodology. Based on the indicators proposed by Lee & Sung (2022), this study developed a 39-item Likert-type scale measuring five core dimensions: (1) Self-Awareness and Professional Development (SAP), (2) Supporting and Constructing Guidance Work (SCG), (3) School-Based Guidance Work (SBG), (4) Client-Based Guidance Work (CBG), and (5) System Connection and Collaboration (SCC). A total of 401 full-time guidance teachers across elementary, junior high, and senior high schools in Taiwan participated in the study, recruited via snowball sampling. Their ages ranged from 22 to 60, with an average of 33 years old. To ensure sufficient statistical power, the study applied G*Power estimations and followed Item Response Theory (IRT) sample size guidelines. The scale’s psychometric properties were examined using multiple techniques. Internal consistency reliability was excellent, with the full scale achieving a Cronbach’s α of .96 and subscales ranging from .722 to .905. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) using the WLSMV estimator yielded strong model fit indices (CFI = .959, TLI = .956, RMSEA = .057), supporting construct validity. Convergent validity was confirmed through Composite Reliability (CR) values exceeding .8 and acceptable Average Variance Extracted (AVE) scores. Although some inter-construct correlations were moderately high, partial discriminant validity was observed. Criterion-related validity was assessed by correlating the scale with the Agentic Engagement (AE) subscale of the Agentic Engagement Scale (Lee & Hong, 2021), yielding significant positive correlations across all five dimensions (r = .399 to .430, p < .001). IRT analysis using the Multidimensional Random Coefficients Multinomial Logit Model (MRCMLM) revealed that item difficulties were appropriately distributed (range = -0.466 to 0.922), and most item fit statistics fell within acceptable ranges (Infit MNSQ = 0.7–1.3). No items exceeded critical thresholds, and the scale demonstrated fairness and stability. Differential Item Functioning (DIF) testing across gender groups (male vs. female) using standardized Liu-Agresti cumulative common log-odds ratio (LOR Z) showed no significant bias (LOR Z range: -1.984 to 1.849), indicating strong measurement invariance.

Results. Group comparisons were conducted to explore differences in perceived competence. Independent sample t-tests and ANOVA revealed no statistically significant differences across gender, years of service (less than five years vs. more than five), school level (elementary, junior high, senior high), or region (north, central, south, east). These findings suggest a high level of consensus regarding the importance of professional competencies across demographic backgrounds, which may reflect the effects of standardized training curricula, consistent job descriptions, and national policy alignment since the 2011 implementation of full-time guidance teacher positions. However, repeated-measures ANOVA revealed significant within-subject differences among the five dimensions of competence (F = 15.48, p < .001). Participants reported the highest levels of agreement with items related to Client-Based Guidance Work (M = 4.45) and System Connection and Collaboration (M = 4.43), followed by Supporting and Constructing Guidance Work (M = 4.38), Self-Awareness and Professional Development (M = 4.33), and the lowest in School-Based Guidance Work (M = 4.31). These results indicate that current guidance teachers prioritize individual case handling and interprofessional coordination, reflecting institutional expectations and administrative emphasis. By contrast, lower ratings in school-wide and developmental roles may reveal a gap between policy ideals and practical implementation.

Discussion and Implications. This validated scale represents a timely and significant contribution to the field of school guidance in Taiwan. It provides a comprehensive, empirically supported instrument for assessing the professional competencies of SGTs and offers a valuable tool for use in pre-service training, in-service development, supervision, and teacher evaluation. Furthermore, the findings raise important reflections on the current guidance culture. Despite the three-tier counseling model emphasizing developmental, intervention, and treatment work, daily practice remains predominantly reactive and case-driven. There appears to be a “professional convergence” across school levels, where administrative culture and performance metrics emphasize secondary and tertiary interventions, potentially marginalizing preventive, developmental, and school-level engagement. This study also highlights the complex relationship between perceived competence and actual practice. The uniformly high agreement across demographic groups may indicate consensus, but could also suggest an overly generalized instrument or hidden constraints in practice. For instance, although school levels differ in student developmental needs (e.g., identity issues in junior high vs. career decision-making in senior high), such differences may not be reflected in perceived competence ratings. The instrument measures self-perceived agreement, not frequency or effectiveness of application, which may limit its sensitivity to contextual nuances. Future research should explore these issues further by integrating qualitative methods such as case analysis, observation, and scenario-based simulations. Expanding the scale’s application in longitudinal studies could also examine how competencies evolve across career stages and in response to shifting school or societal demands. Additionally, efforts should be made to link this competence framework to student outcomes, such as mental health indicators, academic engagement, and help-seeking behavior. In conclusion, the “Professional Competence Scale for School Guidance Teachers in Taiwan” fills a critical gap in the evaluation and development of counseling personnel in the Taiwanese school system. By grounding the scale in local policy, educational structures, and practitioner realities, and validating it through robust statistical analysis, this study provides a much-needed benchmark for strengthening professional identity, improving training quality, and enhancing the overall effectiveness of student guidance services in schools. It also contributes to international discussions on counselor competencies by presenting a model that integrates individual, school-based, and systemic roles within a culturally contextualized framework.

起訖頁 109-150
關鍵詞 專業職能量表輔導教師學生輔導工作Guidance teacherProfessional competenceScaleSchool guidance work
刊名 教育與心理研究  
期數 202603 (49:1期)
出版單位 國立政治大學教育學院
DOI 10.53106/102498852026034901004   複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
粗心有差嗎?試題反應理論四參數模式於我國學生成就測驗之適用性

高等教育知識庫  新書優惠  教育研究月刊  Ericdata高等教育知識庫  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500