国际教育指针及统计的比较与借鉴

An International Comparison of Education Indicators and Statistics

一些国际组织基于各自不同的发展理念与特点，构建了各具特色的教育指针体系：联合国教科文组织立足全纳教育理念，经济合作与发展组织从人力资本理论出发，世界银行从教育是人全面发展核心的视角，联合国开发计划署从可持续发展角度，各自构建了教育发展指针体系。UOE教育统计数据是具有权威性的国际通用教育数据平台。比较与分析显示，进一歩提升我国教育指针与统计的国际化水平，需要从关注教育产出、效率和教学质量，密切与经济世界联系，细化统计分类对应以及完善统计内容等方面进行改进。

Based on different development concepts and characteristics， some international organizations have established their own educational development index system：UNESCO’s is based on the whole concept of inclusive education， OECD’s relies on the human capital theory， World Bank’s on all─round development of people， and UNDP’s onsustainable development. At present， UOE education statistics is an authoritative international platform for education data. As a result of variance analysis and multiple comparison， the paper suggests ways to upgrade China’s education indicators and statistics to international standards as follows：focusing on education output and efficiency as well as quality of teaching. Developing closer relations with the economic world， refining statistical classification and improving access to statistical information.