[期刊承认]与[共同体承认]：我国学术知识生产动力机制的[悖论]

[Community Recognition] Versus [Journals Recognition]：The Paradox of Dynamics of Chinese Academic Knowledge Production

本文在整合布迪厄与默顿关于知识生产动力机制相关理论的基础上，运用深度访谈和文献研究的方法，考察了量化考评制度对两所地方性大学44名学术人知识生产实践和观念的影响。文章认为，由于我国的“期刊承认”并未得到大部分学术人的真正认同，已非“共同体承认”的有机组成部分，“期刊承认”与“共同体承认”之间的冲突导致了我国学术知识生产动机机制的失灵。

Based on the dynamics of knowledge production theory of Bourdieu and Merton， the article explores the influence on the practice and ideas of forty-four academicians from quantitative evaluation in two local universities with the method of in-depth interview and documentary research. The article argues that the reason why the dynamics of academic knowledge production doesn’t’ work is “journals recognition” is not an integral part of “community recognition”， and “journals recognition” is not recognized by the majority of scholars. The conflicts between “journals recognition” and “community recognition” lead to the failure of academic production.