高等教育慕课市场的学分认定机制,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 謝傳崇  羅文君  蘇建洲  林彥廷  張國霖  林宜樺  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文
篇名
高等教育慕课市场的学分认定机制
並列篇名
Mechanism of Credit Award for MOOC in Higher Education Market
作者 邱偉華
英文摘要
As the number of courses and the quantity of learners continue to rapidly increase, MOOCs provide a new market opportunity for the development of higher education. Granting MOOC credit has become a strategic action which universities must consider in order to meet the new challenge posed by MOOC era. The rise of MOOC enables the separation of education and credit award in universities. Universities are being stratified into MOOC exporters and importers , which will definitely change the competitive landscape in higher education. According to the sources of courses and credits, there are four models of MOOC credit: self-awarded credit, consortium credit, contracted credit and accredited credit. By comparing various policies that offer MOOC credit in different countries , this article discovers that a country'S higher education market environment and institutional environment may affect the cost and benefit of granting MOOC credit in different models. The goal and phase of higher education development decide the model of MOOC credit that a country chooses. As the United States has the best higher education in the world, its universities are reluctant to accept MOOCs which are still in its initial stage. MOOC platform and top universities in the US primarily use the model of self-award credit to target potential incoming students for colleges and graduate schools. India as an underdeveloped country with a large population faces the double challenges of improving the quality of university teaching and expanding access to higher education. The government in India and its national MOOC platform adopt the model of accredited credit, asking reputable universities to provide high-quality MOOCs and requiring ordinary universities to accept MOOCs and award credit to MOOC learners. China as a middle - income country needs to improve the quality of higher education through MOOCs. MOOC platforms and universities in China mainly use the model of contracted credit and create a competitive MOOC market, which is conducive to MOOC innovation. The four models of MOOC credit have their advantages and can be conceived as a set of policy tools which can be flexibly applied to promote the growth of MOOC market. China should remove institutional obstacles and introduce the models of self-awarded credit and accredited credit in order to encourage top universities to provide high-quality MOOCs and release MOOC' s potential to improve the quality of higher education. Practical measures are proposed to address the key issues related to MOOC quality assurance and credit transfer. Universities MOOC platforms and Government are recommended to build a multidimensional mechanism to award credit for MOOCs.
起訖頁 064-074
關鍵詞 高等教育慕课市场慕课学分模式慕课学分认定策略model of MOOC creditstrategy to award MOOC credithigher education market
刊名 開放教育研究  
期數 201704 (23:2期)
出版單位 上海遠程教育集團;上海電視大學
DOI 10.13966/j.cnki.kfjyyj.2017.02.007  複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
知识建构教学的学习评价设计研究
該期刊
下一篇
资历框架的级别和标准研究

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500