兩岸國際教育發展與展望之比較研究

A Comparative Study on the Development and Outlook of Cross-Straits International Education

基於臺灣與中國大陸相似的中華文化及漢語背景，本研究運用比較教育學者Bereday的比較研究法，蒐集兩岸國際教育相關官方政策、民間研究及新聞報導等進行描述與解釋，再將蒐集之資料整理分類，就國際教育意識型態、政策深度、發展主軸、教師專業發展差異進行並列比較，結果發現中國大陸的國際教育著重民族主義之擴張與發揚，透過教育擴張自身文化版圖、宣揚其品牌，而臺灣的國際教育則以國際主義、世界主義為核心，意圖培養學子全球責任感及多元共融的心態，成為關注全球議題的世界公民。文末基於此次研究比較，考量當前全球意識型態及政治環境，借鏡中國大陸國際教育推廣方法，提出臺灣國際教育之發展建議。

Based on the similar Chinese culture and context, this study utilizes Bereday’s comparative method. By collecting and categorizing cross-straits public policies, nongovernmental studies and news reports, we paralleled and examined the ideology of international education, the scope of policies, developmental goals, and teacher professional development. Then, through comparison, we found that the purpose of China’s international education is to propagate nationalism, and to extend China’s cultural landscape which is very different from Taiwan’s. The core of Taiwan’s international education is internationalism and cosmopolitanism which tend to cultivate students’ attitude toward global responsibilities and multiple prosperities, let students become the global citizens who can concern about global issues. At the end of the study, we tried to suggest some ways for Taiwan by considering the global ideologies and the political environment, drawing lessons from the way China promotes their international education.