如何看待對【不讓一個孩子掉隊】的質疑與批評

How to Evaluate the Criticism on NCLB in the United States

在美国，自【不让一个孩子掉队】法案出台以来，对其理论框架、政策原则、实施策略到实践效果，始终都存在着许多质疑与批评。【不让一个孩子掉队】的核心目标是”提高成绩”、”缩小差距”，为此【不让一个孩了掉队】提出”成绩问责”、”黄牌警告”等举措，强调重点支持处境不利学生的学习。因此，对【不让一个孩子掉队】的质疑与争议首先也主要集中在这些方面。批评人士为，这些举措导致了实践中过分看重考试分数、忽视优尖学生的培养等问题。但辨证地分析可以发现，【不让一个孩子掉队】总体上对美国基础教育的发展还是利大于弊，值得肯定。

In the United State， since NCLB was passed by the congress， it has been always being criticized. The main purpose of NCLB was to improve the academic performance of US students， especially the performance of the disadvantaged students. Some critics on NCLB argued that it has caused schools and teachers pay to much attention to scores and pay less attention to gifted and talented students. How to evaluate these criticisms? In fact， NCLB still has some benefits to US elementary education in the end.