閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
大学知识生产范式的转向
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | The Paradigm Shift of University Knowledge Production |
作者 | 卓澤林 |
中文摘要 | 自洪堡创建柏林大学以来,其大学知识生产模式经历了由“模式1”到“模式2”再到“模式3”的发展 路径。模式1知识生产模式因其无法满足社会转型的需求而陷人困境,不得不转向模式2;模式2知识生产理论为 突破学科界限,促使大学知识生产走向社会,强调大学、企业和政府之间的互动做出了很大贡献,但因其忽略了公 民社会实体等因素使其难以成为理想的知识生产模式;模式3知识生产理论以创新网络和知识集群为衍生基础, 依托“四重螺旋”创新生态系统为适应情境,以多节点、多边界、多层次、多形态为特征,嵌人联合演进、联合专属和 共同竞合的逻辑运行机制,并以学术性企业为努力方向构成了动态,融合的知识生产创新系统。大学知识生产应 该尽快从模式2向模式3转型,并以此服务国家的发展战略,进而促进地区和国家的经济繁荣发展。 |
英文摘要 | Since Humboldt founded the Berlin University,the knowledge production mode has shifted from Model 1 to Model 2 and then to Model 3. Model 1 could not meet the needs of social transformation, so the production mode had to shit to Mode 2. The latter has made a great contribution to breaking the boundaries of different disciplines, promoting knowledge production towards society and highlighting the interaction among universities, industries and governments; however, it is far away from the tdeal production mode due to its ignorance of some factors, such as the civll society as an entity. Mode 3 is based on the knowledge clusters and innovation networks, and exists under an adaptive context of “quadruple helix innovation ecosystem”. Mode 3 has the characters of being multi-nodal, multi-lateral, multi-level and multi-modal; tt embeds the logical operation mechanisms of co-evolution, co-specialization and co-opetition and has formed dynamic and syncretic knowledge production innovation systems by aming at becoming academic industry. Knowledge production in the university should transform from Model 2 to Model 3, ser- ving the nation?s development strategy and thus promoting the regional and national economy growth. |
起訖頁 | 009-017 |
關鍵詞 | 大学、模式2、模式3、知识生产、转型、university、Model 2、Model 3、knowledge production、shift |
刊名 | 教育學報 |
期數 | 201604 (12:2期) |
出版單位 | 北京師範大學 |
DOI |
|
QR Code | |
該期刊 上一篇
| 国家教育权力的边界--斯宾塞同等自由视域下的解读 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 关于劳动阶层家庭教育研究方法的探讨 |