国际学术话语权视角下的大学学科评价研究 ———以化学学科世界1387 所大学为例

University Subject Evaluation Based on the International Academic Discourse Vision: Taking 1387 World Universities in Chemistry Subject for Example

近年来，关于提升我国国际学术话语权的呼声越来越高。国际学术期刊编委掌控着国际学术话语 权，在大学的学科建设中扮演着重要角色。本研究以国际学术期刊编委数量作为学科评价指标，选取化学学科 396 本SCI 期刊中拥有编委的1387 所大学作为评价对象，构建出一套国际学术话语权视角下的化学学科排名， 并探讨了该排名的特点。研究发现: 我国化学领域的名牌大学在拥有的国际期刊编委数量方面还与国外一流 大学存在着一定差距; 编委排名与大学学科综合排名、论文数量、总被引频次、h 指数等科研产出指标均存在着 积极显著的相关关系，但相关程度又各有不同。

In recent years，the voice from Chinese academia to enhance the international academic discourse of China has gotten higher and higher． Editorial board members of international academic journals control the international academic discourse and play an important role in the university discipline construction． Using a sample of 1387 universities having editorial board members in 396 SCI journals of chemistry subject，the present study builds a subject ranking in chemistry based on the international academic discourse vision and discusses the characteristics of this ranking． The results show that there is a certain gap between top Chinese universities and first － class foreign universities in chemistry; the ranking based on editorial board members are positively and significantly related to the subject comprehensive ranking，number of articles，total number of citations and h － index，respectively，but their correlation level is different．