论高等学校教师职称评审的结果公正与程序公正

Result Justice and Procedural Justice in Faculty Promotion

It is impracticable to achieve complete result justice in faculty promotion． Thus，procedural justice， which benefits result justice，is of great importance． A well-designed procedure with scientific rigor definitely contributes to fairness in promotion decisions． By comparing the faculty promotion procedure in three Chinese universities and two universities in western countries，we find problems still exist with faculty promotion in Chinese universities in quota distribution，minimum standard setting，job position classification，peer review， department-level evaluation，program-level evaluation，and voting rules． Correspondingly，we make the following suggestions: correctly understanding the categorical faculty management and setting reasonable evaluation standards and reasonable weights for teaching and research; establishing job positions in such a way as to improve the quota distribution; strengthening frontline evaluation and within-program evaluation to improve teachers’participation and evaluation validity; attaching importance to peer review to fully exert its effects; and developing the voting rules and procedure judiciously to enhance the voting soundness．