閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
xMOOC的学习评价方法调查研究
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | The Investigation of Learning Evaluation Methods for xMOOC |
作者 | 郑志高、张立国、张春荣 |
中文摘要 | 该文通过对Coursera、edX和Udacity三个平台349门课程学习评价方法的调查、统计与分析,发现xMOOC在课程平台评测系统的支持下,应用传统学习评价方法,开展针对知识层面学习结果的评价。由于应用环境的改变和xMOOC特殊的评价需求,传统学习评价方法在xMOOC中的应用过程中,评价过程和评价方式都产生了相应的变化。目前,xMOOC的学习评价还存在着:(1)如何加强学习评价的公正性和权威性;(2)学习过程评价缺失;(3)如何加强课程平台测评系统的功能及开放性以满足一些课程特殊的学习评价需求三个问题需加以解决。xMOOC学习评价的成功实践为我们应用传统学习评价方法开展网络学习评价实践提供了可借鉴的经验,其中存在的问题也为网络学习评价理论研究带来了思考问题。 |
英文摘要 | By investigating and analyzing the learning evaluation methods of three hundred and forty-nine courses which is on Coursera、edX and Udacity, we find that xMOOC use traditional methods to evaluate students' learning outcomes with the support of assessment system, because of changes in applying environment and special requirements, the traditional evaluation methods used in xMOOC changed in some way. Now, the assessment of learning in xMOOC has three problems to solve:(1)How to improve the fairness and authority of the evaluation.(2)How to evaluate learning process. (3) How to improve the compatibility and functionality of assessment system to meet various requirement from different courses. The successful practice of evaluation of learning in xMOOC provides us useful experience to conduct assessment for online learning by using traditional learning evaluation methods, and the problems also bring some questions which are worth considering when we conduct the theoretical research on assessment of online learning. |
起訖頁 | 044-049 |
關鍵詞 | 学习评价、调查、xMOOC、Evaluation of Learning、Investigation |
刊名 | 中國電化教育 |
期數 | 201411 (334期) |
出版單位 | 中國電化教育雜誌社 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 基于MOOC的学习定制服务模型构建研究 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 开放大学继续教育数字化学习资源开放服务模式研究 |