文本阅读中回指推理发生的整合性因素

The Integrative Factors of Anaphoric Inference During Reading Process

探讨回指距离、干扰词的精细描述、干扰词的典型性对回指推理（先行词通达）的影响。包括2个实验，被试是华南师范大学一二年级本科生164名。采用移动窗口技术，要求被试阅读一定篇数（如，实验1a每个被试阅读15篇）的文章，对不同条件的探测词的反应时进行统计。实验1探讨干扰词精细描述类型（精细描述高和精细描述低）对回指推理的影响。结果表明，干扰的精细描述并非是影响回指推理的主要因素。实验2探讨干扰词和先行词的典型性类型的相对变化对回指推理的影响。结果表明高典型干扰在不同回指距离条件下都会对回指推理产生影响。本研究结果初步证明在影响回指推理的干扰典型性和干扰精细描述的二个因素中，起主要作用的是干扰的典型性。

This paper explores the influence that three text factors: the referential distance between anaphor and antecedent， the elaboration of distractor and the typicality of distractor to anaphor. O’Brien et al (1997) used a rapid serial visual presentation paradigm at a rate of 250 ms/word and found that there is no facilitation when there was a substantial distance between anaphor and its referent. Levine et al (2000) found that it was the elaboration of distractor led to the failure of anaphoric in