为什么说“人性本善”---刘咸?对传统性善论的现代总结,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: Qiaoyun Zhang  Helong Xia  Scopus AI  Semi-trusted loader  Zhi-Wei Sun  美国 通识教育计划  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 大陸/海外期刊 政府機關 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 DOI查詢服務 DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文
篇名
为什么说“人性本善”---刘咸?对传统性善论的现代总结
並列篇名
Why We Say Human Nature is Originally Good: Liu Xianxin's Elaboration on the Traditional Theory of the Original Goodness of Human Nature in Modern Terms
作者 于述勝、周衛勇
英文摘要
Traditional Chinese philosophy emphasizes the way of being human, and thus pays attention to human nature and takes as its mainstream the Theory of Original Goodness of Human Nature. Since late Qing Dynasty, when western learning was introduced into China, the Theory had been paid less attention. Liu Xianxin, a Confucian scholar in modern time who was not only well-versed in the learning of both ancient and modern times but also are erudite in western and Chinese cultures, summarized and elaborated profoundly of the Theory. He advocated sheng (literally means life and its unfolding and realization) as the absolute value and the ultimate measurement to distinguish between the good and the evil; meanwhile, he carried forward the traditional assumptions stated in the YiCommentariss-The supreme virtue of heav- en and earth ss the fulfilling of life , and sheng-sheng ss called yi. He insisted that since nature itself is good, the nature of human and all other beings should be good as well. Moreover, among all other llving things, human inherits the essence of H(principle) and qi(material force) from heaven and earth, thus possessing a supreme nature which s the most precious and ingenious. Furthermore, Liu Xianxin made a major breakthrough in the field of methodology by presenting the argument of zi-dang-yi-ii (unity of Is and Ought). The argument comprises three assertions: firstly, Ought(goodness) derives from nature; ought s the affirmation, unfolding and fulfilment of nature; and what s against nature s certainly not good; secondly,evll s the denial and alienation of nature, and thus evll (Ought not) s not natural; thirdly, good(Ought) and evll (Ought not) are not two things that coexist but two forms of one thing, namely, its normality and aberrance. Knowing this, we would tell that evll s against nature, hence against human nature.
起訖頁 111-119
關鍵詞 刘咸圻、性善论、自当一体、两端相对、正负相对、Liu Xian-xin、Theory of Original Goodness of Human Nature、unity of Is and Ought、ei-ther-or、both ends
刊名 教育學報  
期數 201706 (13:3期)
出版單位 北京師範大學
DOI 10.14082/j.cnki.1673-1298.2017.03.012   複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
高校教师对高等全纳教育的态度研究
該期刊
下一篇
《诗》的教化价值及其实现探索

高等教育知識庫  新書優惠  教育研究月刊  Ericdata高等教育知識庫