基於ACTFL之華語文寫作評分規準,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: Qiaoyun Zhang  Scopus AI  Helong Xia  美国 通识教育计划  Semi-trusted loader  Zhi-Wei Sun  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 大陸/海外期刊 政府機關 學校系所 學協會 民間出版 DOI查詢服務 DOI註冊服務
篇名
基於ACTFL之華語文寫作評分規準
並列篇名
Examining the ACTFL writing assessment rating scale for L2 Chinese learners
作者 熊玉雯、李慧萱、宋曜廷
中文摘要
華語文寫作測驗近年來成為主要大型華語文能力測驗項目之一,其重要性日鉅。本研究以美國外語教學委員會(American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages,簡稱ACTFL)所制定之語言分級能力標準 為框架,制定出華語文寫作評分規準,並進一步以實證研究來探討ACTFL評分規準所遇到的問題。研究語料為國立臺灣師範大學國語教學中心華語文學習者所寫之同題目作文402篇,專業評分者受培訓後根據ACTFL評分規準評分,研究一方面能為瞭解ACTFL華語文寫作測驗的信度之實徵研究,將評分結果透過百分比一致性與類推性理論分析,檢測測驗之信度。另一方面分析ACTFL之評分架構,就評分規準在分數等級上、計分方式上、分向構面上之三主要研究議題來進行深究與探討,將對寫作測驗有實徵之回饋。
英文摘要
The demand for reliable and valid writing assessing methods of Chinese as a foreign language has grown significantly in recent years. This article reports the construction and the subsequent evaluation of the analytic rating scale based on ACTFL (American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages) writing proficiency guidelines. A corpus of 402 writing scripts from different levels at the Mandarin Training Center at National Taiwan Normal University, but all in response to the same writing task, was collected and graded by five professional raters. Each writing test is independently rated by two raters. The validity of the scale is rigidly controlled throughout the construction and raters training process. The grading results provide qualitative analysis of two main points. On the one hand, the reliability of the assessment is examined in terms of the percentage of agreement between raters as well as generalizability and decision studies. On the other, a number of major issues involved in the development of a rating scale are explored for the purpose of this paper, especially on the examination of analytic rating scale against holistic rating scale, as well as the exploration of rating criteria.
起訖頁 111-139
關鍵詞 華語文寫作測驗、語言能力等級、評分規準、信度、testing L2 Chinese writing、language proficiency、ACTFL、analytic rating scales、reliability
刊名 華語文教學研究  
期數 201412 (11:4期)
出版單位 世界華語文教育學會
該期刊
上一篇
從學習者語料庫探究趨向補語「起來」之偏誤情形及教學建議
該期刊
下一篇
「隔」與「不隔」--《漢語語言學》書評

高等教育知識庫  新書優惠  教育研究月刊  Ericdata高等教育知識庫