教育行政人員專業素養指標及權重體系建構之研究

The Indicators and Weight System Construction for Professional Competence of Educational Administration Personnel

綜觀文獻可知，有關公務人員的研究大多涉及公共行政、公共治理、公務人員核心價值或行政倫理等範疇。實務上，不同職系與不同官等的公務人員所需條件其實存有差異，因此，公務人員專業素養的建構必須受到重視。本研究目的即在於建構教育行政人員專業素養指標及權重體系，主要採德懷術及階層分析程序法，以立意取樣方式，邀請七位學者專家、七位簡任公務人員、七位薦任公務人員，組成專家小組。首先，透過兩回合德懷術調查問卷的實施與分析，建構教育行政人員專業素養指標實證架構，包含三個核心素養、11個指標及其內涵：接著，進行指標權重調查問卷的實施與分析。研究結果顯示，第一層核心素養的權重值，依序為教育專業核心素養、管理核心素養、價值核心素養。教育專業核心素養項下的具體指標，以洞悉與掌握法令、政策的權重值最高；管理核心素養項下的具體指標，以分析、規劃與決策的權重值最高；由整體權重的分析結果發現，部分指標的權重值相當接近。最後，綜以結論與建議。

This study aimed to establish the framework and weights of professional competence indicators for personnel in the field of educational administration. The Delphi method and the analytic hierarchy process were employed with a panel of experts recruited through purposive sampling. The panel consisted of seven academics, seven senior civil servants, and seven junior civil servants. A two-round Delphi questionnaire survey was conducted. In the first round, 3 dimensions and 11 indicators were established; in the second round the weights of the indicators were determined. The results indicated the three dimensions were, in descending order of weight, professional education core competencies, management core competencies, and core value competencies. Among the indicators, laws and policies, had the greatest weight in the dimension of professional education core competencies; analyzing, planning, and decision-making, had the greatest weight in the dimension of management core competencies. Overall, certain indicators were quite similar in their weights. Last, the conclusions and suggestions of this study are offered.