公堂揚善,暗室規過:個人喜歡和社會歡迎的人情世故,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 朱丽彬  崔雪娟  黃光男  王美玲  王善边  黃乃熒  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文   購買本期
篇名
公堂揚善,暗室規過:個人喜歡和社會歡迎的人情世故   免費試閱
並列篇名
Praise in Public, Criticize in Private? Effects of Performance Feedback in Public/Private on Personal Liking and Social Popularity: Mediating Role of Perceived "reng qing shi ku"
作者 張滿玲鍾昆源劉思怡
中文摘要
「公堂揚善,暗室規過」涉及看場合說話的變通和一味說好話的鄉愿。研究設計一個學生上臺報告表現不佳、好朋友給予回饋的情境故事,操弄表現回饋(批評、讚揚)和場合公開性(公開、私下),請153位大學生評定回饋者的真誠和人情世故,以及他們個人喜歡此人和以為他受社會歡迎的程度。階層迴歸分析發現,在控制混淆變項真誠知覺後,表現回饋和場合公開性在個人喜歡上有交互作用;在社會歡迎上,只發現表現回饋主要效果。而且人情世故知覺在上述兩個效果中都扮演完全中介的角色。此顯示參加者個人喜歡的人情世故是變通,認為鄉愿是比較受社會歡迎的人情世故。最後區別華人文化以仁為基礎的真誠和西方文化忠於自我的真誠,並討論人情世故的虛偽和真誠。
英文摘要
"To praise in public and to criticize in private" is a code of conduct in Confucian culture, in which "speaking appropriately" (flexibility) and "speaking praise invariably" (hypocrite) for different occasions were involved. To understand personal liking and social popularity toward "ren qing shi gu"(人情世故)of university students in modern Taiwan, the study designed a scenario about a student’s poor presentation. The presenter asked his close friend to give feedback. Performance feedback (criticism or praise) and occasion publicity (in public or in private) were manipulated. 153 participants were randomly assigned to one of the 4 conditions. They, as observers, were asked to read the scenario and rate the feedback giver on authenticity, "ren qing shi gu", personal liking and social popularity. When perceived authenticity was controlled in hierarchical regression analysis, it was found that perceived "ren qing shi gu" served as a mediator both in interaction effect of performance feedback and occasion publicity on personal liking, and in main effect of performance feedback on social popularity. Participants personally liked criticism more in private than in public and praise more in public than in private. They believed that whether in public or in private, praise was perceived more socially popular than criticism. Flexibility and hypocrite were different kinds of "ren qing shi gu". In conclusion, difference between authenticity based on "ren", emphasized in Chinese culture, and authenticity based on "true self", emphasized in western culture, was suggested. Hypocrisy and authenticity of "ren qing shi gu" was also discussed.
起訖頁 29-54
關鍵詞 變通虛偽保留面子flexibilityhypocrisysaving-face
刊名 教育與心理研究  
期數 201206 (35:2期)
出版單位 國立政治大學教育學院
該期刊
上一篇
經濟弱勢大學生情意健康之探討:易受傷害性與復原力因子效果分析
該期刊
下一篇
雙元孝道的心理運作功能:對親子關係之影響暨教養行為之中介

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500