閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
不同条件下拟合指数的表现及临界值的选择
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Performance of Fit Indices in Different Conditions and the Selection of Cut-off Values |
作者 | 郭庆科、李芳、陈雪霞、王炜丽、孟庆茂 |
中文摘要 | 在本模拟研究中设计了6种样本容量,6种因子载荷,和4种评分等级,并考察了正态和非正态分布两种情况。采用的错误模型为参数误置(真模型中每个因子各由5 个题目来测量,错误模型中则是第一个因子由6个题测量,另两个因子各由4个和5个题来测量,即有一个因子载荷被误置)模型。结果发现(1)样本量、载荷量、评分等级数和分布形态都对GOF的取值确有影响。其中分布形态的影响最大。NNFI、IFI在不同条件下的平均值是最稳定的,其次是CFI、 RMSEA和SRMR。它们都算是值得推荐的GOF,尤其是NNFI和IFI。(2)在正态分布中,当样本量≥1000时,根据NNFI、IFI、 CFI、RMSEA、SRMR对模型是否拟合做出判断时有很低的两类错误率,在样本量<1000时则不理想。在偏态条件下无论选择哪个GOF两类错误率都很高。(3)采用2指数策略在很多情况下也不能显著降低两类错误率。(4)由于在数据分布非正态,或正态但样本量 |
英文摘要 | In this simulation study we designed 6 sample-size conditions, 6 factor-loading conditions, 4 rating-category conditions, and 2 distribution conditions. To each data-set in the conditions a correct model and a mis-specified model are fitted. In the correct model there are 15 items and 3 factors, each factor is measured by 5 items. While in the mis-specified model the factors are measured by 6, 4, and 5 items, we call the mis-specified model wrong-parameterized model, which is different from those studied by former researchers.The results are: 1. Sample size, loading size, rating category and distribution form all have influence on the values of fit indices. And the influence of distribution form is the largest. The values of NNFI、IFI are most stable across all conditions, values of CFI、RMSEA and SRMR are less stable, but their variations are rather small, these 5 indices should be recommended. 2. In normal distribution conditions, when sample size≥1000, model right-wrong judgment based on NNFI、IFI、CFI、RMSEA、SRMR all have low two type error (α+β) rate. But distribution forms are non-normal and when sample size |
起訖頁 | 109-118 |
關鍵詞 | 2界值策略、2指数策略、模型拟合、结构方程模型、2-cutoff-value strategy、2-indice strategy、model-data fit、Structural Equation Modeling |
刊名 | 心理學報 |
期數 | 200801 (40:1期) |
出版單位 | 中國科學院心理研究所;中國心理學會 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 概率分布等值法及其应用 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 检验的临界值:真伪差距多大才能辨别?——评《不同条件下拟合指数的表现及临界值的选择》 |