閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
心理学中话语分析的立场与方法
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Discourse Analysis in Psychology: Position and Method |
作者 | 杨莉萍 |
中文摘要 | 研究区分了两种不同的[话语]定义,它们各自引申出一类[话语分析]。最为常见的是话语的描述性定义--[话语是建构某个对象的意义、表征或陈述系统];另一种是功能性定义--[话语即做事];[话语即行动];[话语即实践]。话语分析在心理学中首先是一种研究立场,其次是一类研究方法。作为研究立场,话语分析悬置了心理、人格等传统心理学构念;解构了实证研究的客观性原则;重新调整了心理学的研究目标。作为研究方法,心理学中的话语分析有修辞研究、隐喻研究、叙事研究等多种形式。 |
英文摘要 | [Discourse] is primarily defined in two ways in current Psychology. The widespread definition is a descriptive model, which comes from structuralism and defines discourse as [a system of meanings, representations or statements to construct an object]. The other is a functional model, which is connected closely with post-structuralism and explains discourse as either [doing things] or actions or social practice. As an academic position, discourse analysis has laid aside many basic psychological constructs including [mind] and [identity] etc., deconstructed the criterion of [objectivity] in positive psychology, and changed the aim of psychological research. As research methods, discourse analyses cover a variety of studies including rhetoric research, metaphor research, and narrative research, etc. |
起訖頁 | 532-538 |
關鍵詞 | 话语、话语分析、社会建构、研究立场、研究方法、discourse、discourse analysis、social construction、research position、research method |
刊名 | 心理科學進展 |
期數 | 200705 (15:3期) |
出版單位 | 中國科學院心理研究所;中國心理學會 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 运动性心理疲劳问题的研究现状 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 如何描述发展趋势的差异:潜变量混合增长模型 |