從「現象學反思」到「意識型態批判」--論Husserl與Apel的方法論對比及其在教育研究上的意義

From Phenomenological Reflections to Ideological Critics--Methodological Comparison between Husserl and Apel and Its Implications on Educational Research

本文係以方法論的反省為著眼，就Edmund Husserl的「現象學反思」（phenomenological reflection）與Kral-Otto Apel所主張的「意識型態批判」（ideological critics）做為對比的焦點。基於方法對立性的凸顯，本文企圖一方面試著聚焦於「現象學反思」與「意識型態批判」在知識論與方法學上比較；另一方面則為期待透過這樣的對照，進而探索其在教育研究方法論反思上所孕含的意義。

Based on methodological reflection foundation， the researcher compares the methodological standpoints between Edmund Husserl’s “phenomenological reflection” and Kral-Otto Apel’s “ideological critics” in this paper. The main purposes of this article are as follows: to explore the significance of methodological comparison and inquire its educational research implications.