閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
我國小班政策之檢討與改進建議
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | On Class-size Reduction Policy for Taiwan Compulsory Education |
作者 | 陳利銘、許添明 |
中文摘要 | 小班政策一直是國際教育改革運動的焦點,我國也不例外,除了在教育基本法與國民教育法宣示外,行政院在1998 年公佈的「教育改革行動方案」,也以將近400 億元的經費來降低國民中小學班級人數。但正因為推行小班政策的費用不貲,也引起學者熱烈的論辯。本論文的目的即在透過美國降低班級規模的實踐經驗,來檢討我國在這方面的做法,我們發現我國小班政策有四個問題,包括一、小班政策目標值,每班35 人,缺乏學理基礎及教育理念;二、小班政策可能擴大城鄉之間的師資差距;三、小班不一定改變教師教學信念與方式;四、對小班政策的評鑑及研究不足。本論文根據上述發現,也提出近、中、長程建議,以利我國小班政策的推行。 |
英文摘要 | Class-size reduction policy has always been the focus of international education reform movements. In Taiwan, the Ministry of Education has invested nearly forty billions to reduce class-size of compulsory education since 1998. The vast investment of class-size reduction policy had triggered debates among policy makers and researchers. The main purpose of this article is to use class-size reduction experience in the United States to reflect the similar policy design and the practice for Taiwan’s compulsory education. By doing that, we find four problems in class-size reduction policy in Taiwan, including: 1. there is no educational rationale for 35 students per class; 2. class-size reduction may enlarge the inequity in teacher experience and qualifications between country and city; 3. class-size reduction doesn’t automatically change teachers’ belief and methods; and 4. there are no sufficient evaluation reports on class-size reduction policy in Taiwan. In the end, we provide three recommendations to improve the practice of class-size reduction for Taiwan’s compulsory education. |
起訖頁 | 1-20 |
關鍵詞 | 小班政策、教育財政、政策分析、Class-size reduction、Educational finance、Policy analysis |
刊名 | 教育政策論壇 |
期數 | 200308 (6:2期) |
出版單位 | 國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 美國教師工會之發展:兼論對臺灣組織教師工會之啟示 |