閱讀全文 購買本期 | |
篇名 |
我國師資培育革新的憲法基礎探究:教育基本權保障觀點
免費試閱
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | A Study on the Constitutional Rationale of Teacher Education Reforms in Taiwan: An Education Basic Rights Protection Perspective |
作者 | 王等元 |
中文摘要 | 我國推動教育改革已逾20年,惟其依據之法律的正當性基礎如何?殊值探究。職是,本文旨從教育基本權保障觀點,以憲法釋義學方法,探究我國師資培育革新之法的正當性基礎。本文之結論與建議:一、我國《師資培育法》所建構之師資培育體系似欠缺完整性,在職教師專業發展亟待法制化;二、國民教育基本權與師資培育法制二者間具有相當關聯性,師資培育革新可做為教育基本權之國家保護義務之一;三、標準本位師資培育可做為我國未來10年師資培育革新之組織與程序保障機制;四、憲法法治國原則可導出我國《憲法》第162條「全國公私立之教育文化機關,依法律受國家之監督」,以之做為師資培育革新之正當性基礎。 |
英文摘要 | We have carried out educational reforms for more than twenty years in Taiwan, and have launched the 12-Year Basic Education since 2014. The experiences we have had indicate that teacher education reforms have always been the key issue to education reforms in Taiwan. This study aims to discuss the constitutional rationale of teacher education reforms by interpretative epistemology of the Constitution from an education basic rights perspective. Research findings are as follows: 1. The Teacher Education System built on Teacher Education Act does not seem to be sound enough; 2. The teacher education is related to education basic rights; 3. The Standards-based Teacher Education is viewed as the protection mechanism of organization and process for teacher education reforms in the coming decade; and 4. The Article 162 induced by the Constitutional Rule-by-law Rules is viewed as the constitutional rationale of teacher education reforms. |
起訖頁 | 065-092 |
關鍵詞 | 師資培育法、教育基本權、標準本位師資培育、憲法釋義學、Teacher Education Act、education basic rights、standards-based teacher education、interpretative epistemology of the constitution |
刊名 | 教育政策論壇 |
期數 | 201611 (19:4期) |
出版單位 | 國立暨南國際大學教育政策與行政研究所 |
DOI |
|
QR Code | |
該期刊 上一篇
| 科技大學內部評鑑人員應有的評鑑能力與扮演的角色 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 中學生家庭作業時間與學習成就關係之研究:以TEPS資料分析為例 |