閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
美国“学校大辩论”的学术研究路径回顾
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | A Review of the Academic Research Route of the Great School Debates in America |
作者 | 陈露茜 |
中文摘要 | “学校大辩论”是对20世纪80年代以来,特别是1983年《国家处于危机之中:教育改革势在必行》发表以来,由美国的ー些“教育政治家”以著书立说的形式展开的ー场来于公共教育改革的论战。对“学校大辩论”的研究几乎是和“学校大辩论”同时展开的,囊括了史学保守派、史学激进派、重建主义教育学派和批判教育学派四大流派,形成了阐释性与批判性两条研究路径。 |
英文摘要 | Since the 1980s, especially after the publication of A Nation at Risk in 1983, there happened the great debates about American public education reforms among “educational politicians .That was so-call the “Great School Debates”. As the development of the "Great School Debates,the researches on it were going on as well, and there were four schools involved in it. They were conservative historians, radical historians, reconstruction pedagogy,and critical pedagogy. |
起訖頁 | 059-063 |
關鍵詞 | 美国、学校大辩论、史学保守派、史学激进派、重建主义教育学派、批判教育学派、the Great School Debates、conservative historian、radical historian、reconstruction pedagogy、critical pedagogy |
刊名 | 比較教育研究 |
期數 | 201112 (33:12期) |
出版單位 | 北京師範大學 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 教育扩张的新制度主义分析:经验与理论研究进展 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 人文之维与“精神贵族”:欧文•白璧德大学教育思想评析 |