高等教育出版
熱門: 許庭嘉  吳清山  林奇臻  黃乃熒  孫志麟  丘愛鈴  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文
篇名
英国和德国现代学徒制的比较研究———基于制度互补性的视角
並列篇名
A Comparative Study of Modern Apprenticesliii) in England and Germany from the Perspective of Institutional Complementarity
作者 關晶
英文摘要
By modifying the institutional analysis framework suggested by W. Richard Scott (2010), this paper offers a framework for analyzing the institutional complementarity of apprenticeship, in which the three dimensions of regulative, normative and cultural-cognitive factors interact with each other. England and Germany are selected as cases as they are the typical Anglo-Saxon countries and Rhine countries which have had great success. In terms of apprentice participation, the German system shows better equilibrium than the English one. Regulative factors in the German system ar^ at medium lvel , and the system relies mor^ on the strong norma- tive and cultural-cognitive factors. In England , both normative and cultural-cognitive factors are weak , while the regulative factors are strong due to the incentives for apprentices. Howevr , the institutional arrangements in both countries aims at the same direction : providing apprentices with promising future. In terms of employer, s participation , the German system has better equilibrium , with relatively stronger normative and cultural-cognitive factors than regulative factors. The three factors reinforce each other. However ,in the English system , strong regulative factors compensate the weak normative and cultural-cognitive factors. Despite great difference , Germany and England share the similarity in institutional arrangements. In terms of quality assurance , Germany presents an excellent model , in which quality assurance goes a- long with all the process of apprenticeship training , including providers ’ accreditation , training standards , training process , evaluation and qualification. The regulative , normative and cultural-cognitive factors are all strong and they reinforce each other. Great efforts have also been made in England , but all the three factors are still not strong enough and need improvement. To sum up , the results show that : a) matual-reinforcement and compensation are the two basic forms of institutional complementarity for apprenticeship; b) strengthening regulative factors could be an effective approach for government to developing apprenticeship; c) the key point to institutional complementarity for ap- prentice participation is to provide promising careers for apprentices; d) the institutional complementarity for employer participation lies in reducing the risk of poaching externality; e) institutional complementarity for quality assurance relies on the reinforcement of institutions upon all the process of apprenticeship training; f) complementarity also exists between institutions for quantity improvement and those for quality enhancement.
起訖頁 039-046
關鍵詞 英国现代学徒制德国现代学徒制制度互补性比较研究modem apprenticeshipinstitutional complementaritycomparison
刊名 華東師範大學學報(教育科學版)  
期數 201702 (35:1期)
出版單位 華東師範大學
DOI 10.16382/j.cnki.1000-5560.2017.01.004  複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
我国职业教育现代学徒制构建中的关键问题
該期刊
下一篇
高职院校现代学徒制构建的制度瓶颈及实践探索

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500