威廉斯创造力测验的信效度检验

Ｒeliability and Validity of Williams Creativity Assessment Packet

威廉斯创造力测验从人格倾向和思维活动两个取向全面评估学生的创造力，然而在我国大陆的研 究和运用几乎只限于创造性倾向量表，创造性思考活动的研究鲜有问津。本研究的目的在于研究创造性倾向量 表和创造性思考活动的信效度及其关系。研究以上海市某高中约120 名高一学生为被试样本，同时施测创造性 倾向量表和创造性思考活动，1 年后重测，分别基于经典测验理论和概化理论对测验信度进行多方面检验，并 初步分析测验效度和考察两个测验的关系。结果表明，两个测验的信度总体说来良好，其结构效度得到了一定 证据支持; 两测验有一定关系，但并不紧密，结合使用两个测验才能全面评估学生的创造力。

The Williams Creativity Assessment Packet ( CAP) is able to assess students' creativity both from personality tendency and thinking，but its research and application in China mainland is almost limited to the Creativity Tendency Scale． Ｒesearch on Creativity Thinking Activities is seldom seen． The present research aimed at studying the reliability and validity of Creativity Tendency Scale as well as Creativity Thinking Activities，and investigating the relationship between the two tests． After testing and retesting ( in one year) about 120 freshmen of a senior high school in Shanghai with both Creativity Tendency Scale and Creativity Thinking Activities，the research examined the reliability of two tests from different perspectives based on Classical Test Theory and Generalizability Theory，preliminarily analyzed the validity of two tests，and looked at the correlation between two tests． The results indicated that two tests' reliability on the whole is good and their construct validity is supported by some evidences． In addition，this research found that the Creativity Tendency Scale has some relation to the Creativity Thinking Activities，but not close． In order to assess students' creativity comprehensively，we ought to use the two tests in combination．