關於鄉鎮市政府參予促進案件之法律問題研究：從屏東市國民運動中心委外營運案論起

行政院於民國九十九年核定「改善國民運動環境與打造運動島計畫」，其中程計畫「興建國民運動中心」之推動策略，確定採用「中央補助、地方執行」之模式；而經建會進而建議「本計畫宜儘量以ROT方式規劃興建」，惟體委會在執行時，其補助興建對象除直轄市及縣政府之外，亦將屏東市羅列其內，因此引發：市政府在執行該計畫時，其委外之法源為何？其所衍生之土地撥用、權利金設定及其他相關法律問題如何解決？鄙人謹以屏東市國民運動中心委外營運案為例，探討鄉鎮市政府參與促參案件時之法源依據，並進而研議相關衍生問題之因應策略，以為有司日後在制訂政策或解決問題之參考。

In 2010， the Executive Yuan initiated and approved the ”Plan Of Improving the Sporting Circumstances and Establishing the Sporting Island”， and the mid-term strategies included building many sporting centers over the state. The Council for Economic Planning and Development further suggested that the execution and construction should be based on the type of Operation and Transfer（ROT）provided in “Act for Promotion of Private Participation in Infrastructure Projects”. In performing this plan， the Sports Affairs Council of the Executive Yuan decided to assist several civil townships to build the sporting centers， except the originally planned county（city）governments. This aroused many discussions and disputes in the executive proceeding， but there is no final conclusion till now. As a citizen of PingTong City， I wish to see a happy ending， so I study the legal basis of the township/city’s’ participation and analysis the concerning problems. This work aims to answer the followings: What is the legal basis of the township/city to participate the Infrastructure Projects? How to dissolve the legal problems arising from the allocation process of the required land owned by other government and the setting of the contributing royalty from the use of the land? And Finally， I will try to make a practical and available suggestion to the authority for future law making and problem dissolving.