中美高等教育哲学研究的差异——兼论彰显“生命性”的高等教育哲学

On the Philosophy Differences of Higher Education between China and America

本文通过对中美高等教育哲学的比较，发现二者在研究路径、逻辑起点以及对高等教育的属性的认识等方面存在着较大的差异，并就此提出了自己的看法。高等教育哲学研究的性质是作为行事依据的事理研究，需要同时肯定逻辑与经验的双重作用；应该在知识与人的双重关照下建构真正的高等教育哲学，应该同时兼顾高等教育的共相与殊相，努力将高等教育的教育性、学术性、职业性融为一炉。在此基础上，期待一种彰显“生命性”的高等教育哲学。

The philosophy of higher education in China is developing on the basis of critical thinking about Brubacher!s Philosophy of Higher Education，and forming several different viewpoints The results from comparing the philosophy of higher education between China and Amenca shows that there are several differences in the aspects of research path， logical starting point and basic attribute etc In my view， the philosophy of higher education should affirm the double effects of experience and logic，complete the theoretical construction in the version of both profound knowledge and people，and integrate educational nature，academic nature，occupational nature into each other Moreover，we expect a new philosophy of higher education which reveals the life influence of higher education