閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
学术生涯:赌博还是游戏?
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Academic Career: Gamble or Game? |
作者 | 陈先哲、刘蟲 |
中文摘要 | 马克斯•韦伯将德国式学术生涯比作一场鲁莽的赌博,指出作为筹码的学术自由的重要性;布迪厄则将法国式学术生涯比作一场游戏,强调文化资本在游戏中的关键作用。事实上,无论是学术“赌博”还是“游戏”,其共同特征是拥有相对透明并得到学术共同体认可和遵守的规则。以此作为参照系,中国式学术生涯既非“赌博”亦非“游戏”。唯有通过政府学术治理的“去行政化”与学术共同体的自我变革双效并举,建立符合学术共同体内在逻辑的学术规则,中国学术人方能真正具备参与学术“赌博”或“游戏”的条件。 |
英文摘要 | Max Weber compared the German-style academic career to a reckless gamble, stressing the importance of academic freedom as a bargaining counter, while Pierre Bourdieu compared the French -style academic career to a game, emphasizing the critical role of cultural capital. In fact, whether a gamble or a game, their common characteristics are some relatively transparent rules recognized and abided by the academic community. In contrast, the Chinese —style academic career is neither a gamble nor a game. Only through the M de -administration" of government control in the academic field and the self-transformation of academic community to establish legitimate academic rules, can Chinese academic researchers engage in the academic gamble or game per se. |
起訖頁 | 038-042 |
關鍵詞 | 学术生涯、赌博、游戏、学术规则、Academic Career、Gamble、Game、Academic Rule |
刊名 | 復旦教育論壇 |
期數 | 201307 (11:4期) |
出版單位 | 復旦大學 |
該期刊 上一篇
| “经典名著”融入大学通识课程的理性审视——基于N大学的实证调查 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 大学演进中“学市自由”的意义嬗变 |