MIT OCW 项目与网易公开课运营模式比较研究

A Sino-U.S. Comparison of OCW Operational Mode ——the Case between MIT and Net Ease

网络公开课的兴起为教育供给缺口问题的解决开辟了新途径。在北美高校发起的网络公开课以及国家精品课程的助推下，中国网络公开课代表——网易公开课也获得了迅速的发展。对中美两个网络公开课领域的典范项目——MIC OCW与网易公开课进行比较分析，有利于探索适合中国特色的开放教育资源的共享机制。通过对两个项目进行案例对比分析，发现两者在资源来源、参与方动机及运行机制等方面均具有显著的差异；网易公开课作为目前中国网络公开课的主要模式之一，其对中国未来教育资源共享机制的探索会有深远的影响

There is a huge gap between the need of social development and high education supply， which the traditional education cannot fill， and also it’s economical un-feasible to build more college. ICT brings e-learning whose development provides a new way to even people’s rights to be educated. Since 2001， MIT launched the OWC project and the international campaign of ORE. NETEASE is a Chinese NASDAQ listed Company which is also a reprehensive of Chinese OCW. To study the different operational mode is profound for Chinese ORE program. We put MIT and NETEASE together and do a Sino-U.S. case-level comparison， and find out that there are obvious differences in the OCW source， participants， motivation and organizational mechanism. We believe that the NETEASE maybe a prosperous way to develop Chinese ORE.