研究型大学基础研究产出比较:基于"985 工程"高版与AAU 学術论文的分析

A Comparative Study on Basic Research Output:Based on Scientific Papers of "985 Universities" and AAU

本研究选取中国"985 工程"高校和AAU 作为研究对象，从群体整体水平和学科水平两个层面对2002-2011 年"985 工程"高校和AAU 学术论文的数量、质量、活动指数和相对引文影响力等指标进行分析。研究结果表明:"985 工程"高校的科研实力、科研水平和学术影响力呈逐年递增趋势，但与AAU 在论文的数量和质量上还有显著差异。"985 工程"高校学科之间的科研实力有明显差异:工科和理科是"985 工程"高校的活跃学科，人文社科是"985 工程"高校的低活跃学科;生命类和人文社科是AAU 的活跃学科，材料科学、化学和农业科学是AAU 的低活跃学科;"985 工程"高校22 个学科的论文影响力较低，与AAU 存在明显差距。

The paper analyzes the publication output between "985" universities and AAU during the period of 2002-2011 from the perspectives of overall strength and disciplinary strength, and the main indicators include the quantity and quality of papers, activity index and relative citation impact, etc. It is found that the strength, level and impact of scientific research in "985" universities have increased year by year, but there is still a wide gap between "985" universities and AAU both in paper quality and quantity. From the perspective of disciplinary strength, the gap between "985 universities" and AAU is remarkable. Engineering and science are active while social science is inactive in "985" universities. As for AAU, life science and social sciences are active, while material science, chemistry and agricultural science are inactive. The impact of papers produced by "985" universities is relatively low compared with AAU.