苏联教学论与美国课程论：在中国的误读与误解

Soviet Didactics vs. Anglo-American Curriculum Studies: Misreadings and Misunderstandings in Mainland China

我国在对苏联教学论和美国课程论的借鉴过程中出现了一些误读和误解，比如，在引介苏联教学论的过程中忽视了其对"教养"和"教养内容"的高度关注；在引入美国课程论的过程中忽视了其对"教学"和"民主精神"的关注。造成这些误读和误解的根本原因是对源于两种不同文化和语言脉络的研究范式的理解和认识存在偏差，所以，走出目前困境的根本途径在于从本源上认识这两大范式，以纠正目前我国教学论和课程论研究中存在的问题。

We have long ignored the core concepts of "obrazovanie" (oбразование)and the teaching content when we introduce the Soviet didactics(дидактика). The teaching and the spirit of democracy are ignored when American Curriculum Studies is introduced. The fundamental reason for this is that the Soviet didactics (дидактика)and the Anglo-American Curriculum Studies are from two different cultures of education. So, we need to clarify and better understand themto do away with the misunderstandings thereof.