理解评估与成绩预测：两种不同的元理解监测形式

Rating Comprehension and Predicting Performance: Clarifying Two Forms of Metacomprehension Monitoring

探讨理解评估与成绩预测与各种强化元理解监测线索的认知任务的关系。结果发现，理解评估与成绩预测的判断值偏离标准测验成绩的程度受监测线索强化方式的调节；主动强化监测线索比被动强化更能提高理解评估和成绩预测的精确性；精确的理解评估或成绩预测所需的线索不同，利用同一线索评估理解或预测成绩，其精确性也不同。这一结果挑战了元理解监测的一维观，表明理解评估与成绩预测涵盖了元理解监测不同方面的心理特征。

Metacomprehension monitoring refers to the process of a reader monitoring and evaluating his or her understanding of a text. Participants may make metacomprehension monitoring judgments by either rating how much they understand a text， or predicting how well they can do in a comprehension test. Previous research seems to treat these questions as interchangeable and which one to use as a matter of convenience. Researchers have not investigated whether or not these questions may tap different meta