閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
PBL 教学浊与CBL教学法的比较 ─ 基于两种教学法的转换在临床课程学习上的效果分析
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Comparing Problem─Based Learning with Case─Based Learning:Effects of a Major Curricular Shift at Two Institutions |
作者 | Srinivasan M、夏颖、顾鸣敏 |
中文摘要 | 本文通过调查加州大学洛杉矶分析(UCLA)和加州大学戴维斯分析(UCD)学生和教师对以问题为基础的学习(PBL)和以案例为基础的学习(CBL)的认知和感受,结果发现,89%的学生和84%的教师更倾向于CBL教学法,两校教师和学生都认为CBL的引导式探究优于PBL的开放式探究。 |
英文摘要 | By comparing Problem─Based Learning(PBL)with Case─Based Learning(CBL)between University of California at Los Angeles(UCLA)and the University of California at Davis(UCD), the writers find that CBL was preferred by students(89%)and faculty(84%) across schools and learner levels. The conclusion is that learners and faculty at two major academic medical centers overwhelmingly prefer CBL(guided inquiry) to PBL(open inquiry). |
起訖頁 | 088-091 |
關鍵詞 | 比较研究、教学法、PBL教学法、CBL、Comparative study、Problem-Based Learning(PBL)、Case-Based Learning(CBL) |
刊名 | 復旦教育論壇 |
期數 | 200909 (7:5期) |
出版單位 | 復旦大學 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 教育工作者及其报酬:政策、实施与系统协调问题(上) |
該期刊 下一篇
| 境外医学教育对中西医结合教学的启示 |