伪书之争与教育史研究的文献学基础

Disputes over Pseudographs and the Philological Foundation of Educational History Studies

本文从文献学角度概述了中国伪书的辨别方法，并以《子夏易传》和《古文尚书》两个伪书公案为例，说明伪书本身也有一定的史料价值和教育史研究方面的参鉴意义，故而不可一概而废。因此，关注伪书的问题，有助于强化教育史学科的文献学基础。

This paper summarizes the methods of distinguishing Chinese pseudographs from the perspective of philology， and cites the legal cases of Zixia Yi Zhuana and Gu Wen Shang Shu as examples to demonstrate pseudographs’ value as historical materials and useful references to educational history studies. Therefore， pseudographs cannot be entirely denied. Accordingly， if we pay attention to the issue of pseudographs， it will help to consolidate the philological foundatgion of the discipline of educational history.