教育实验中证伪合理性思考

A rational consideration of falsification in educational experiment

一、作为方法论的证伪与作为教育实验结果的证伪。 1.作为方法论的证伪关于科学与非科学的分界标准，一直是科学哲学中的一个重要问题。逻辑实证主义者的分界标准是证实原则，波普尔的分界标准是证伪原则，而库恩的分界标准是[范式]原则，那卡托斯则认为分界标准应是预见性原则。波普尔认为，理论虽然不能为经验所证实却能被经验所证伪，[作为划界的标准不是可证实性，而是可证伪性]，[应当把理论系统的可反驳性或可证伪性作为分界的标准。]他所理解的是实验对理论的证伪。

Falsification in methodology and falsification of experimental results are two categories which are connected and differentiated. Because of a series of deep considerations falsification of experimental results will bring about rational crises. All things considered， the article tries to establish the legitimate status of falsification in educational experiment at a new angle.