中文阿拉巴馬親職問卷簡式版之信度與效度研究

Reliability and Validity of the Chinese Version of the Short-form Alabama Parenting Questionnaire

本研究之目的在檢驗中文阿拉巴馬親職問卷簡式版的信度與效度，該問卷評估和品行問題有關的五個教養面向：正向親職、家長參與、監督不良、紀律不一致、體罰，其中正向親職、家長參與為保護性因素，監督不良、紀律不一致、體罰為無效親職教養因素。研究對象為450位育有年齡六至十八歲子女的家長，研究結果發現中文阿拉巴馬親職問卷具有可接受的內部一致性信度和重測信度，驗證性因素分析結果顯示模式適配度良好，且多群組分析結果顯示問卷具有跨性別的測量不變性。相關分析結果顯示無效親職教養因素與中文長處與困難問卷的品行問題分量表有顯著正相關，而保護性因素與品行問題分量表有顯著負相關|無效親職教養因素與家長自我效能感有顯著負相關，而保護性因素與家長自我效能感有顯著正相關|當家長使用正向親職技巧的頻率越高時，家長的親職壓力越低。研究結果顯示該問卷可以適用於台灣。

The purposes of the study were to examine the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Short-form Alabama Parenting Questionnaire (APQ-SF, Parent Form). The research subjects were 450 parents with children aged 6-18. The questionnaire assesses five parenting constructs related to conduct problems-positive parenting, parental involvement, poor monitoring/supervision, inconsistent discipline, and corporal punishment. Of these five, the former two-positive parenting and parental involvement-are positive parenting factors whereas the latter three, including poor monitoring/supervision, inconsistent discipline, and corporal punishment, belonged to negative parenting factors. Internal consistency reliability and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire were found to be acceptable. A confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was conducted and the model demonstrated a satisfactory fit to the data, suggesting that the hypothesized measurement model of the questionnaire was supported. Measurement invariance across gender was investigated and confirmed using multi-group CFA. The conduct problems subscale of the Chinese version of Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) was positively correlated with the negative parenting factors of the questionnaire| however, it was negatively correlated with the positive parenting factors of the questionnaire. Likewise, Parental self-efficacy was negatively correlated with the negative parenting factors of the questionnaire whereas it was positively correlated with the positive parenting factors of the questionnaire. Parenting stress was negatively correlated with the positive parenting subscale of the questionnaire. The results suggested that the Chinese version of the Short-form Alabama Parenting Questionnaire can be applied in Taiwan.