台灣的大學教師評鑑制度

Faculty Assessment in Universities in Taiwan

為確保大學教育的品質，教育部已相繼推動實施大學系所評鑑及校務評鑑，2005年更透過《大學法》之修訂，明確要求各大學應建立教師評鑑制度。迄今，教師評鑑已是近年來各大學配合教育部政策積極推動的重要工作。惟因教育部對教師評鑑工作的推動，原則上是採取授權各校自訂辦法的方式進行，並未訂頒統一的評鑑規範或評鑑指標與權重，本研究於2011學年度採取文件分析法，並輔以電話調查，探討各大學教師評鑑制度建構之類型及實施之方式。本文是國科會專題研究計畫報告之一部分；根據本研究發現，國內所有大學校院均已訂定其大學教師評鑑相關辦法，並開始實施教師評鑑。但因各大學訂定及修訂教師評鑑辦法均需取得教師之同意與支持，經校務會議通過，故各大學除評鑑項目主要是依大學法之規定，以教學、研究、輔導與服務等為範圍外，各校究竟如何自訂其教師評鑑辦法及實施規則，其實施對象、實施頻率、評鑑指標、是否有免評條款，及各校對教師評鑑結果之處理方式等，並不完全一致。

The assessment of faculty (or evaluation of teachers) has been an important work for the universities in Taiwan in recent years. According to the revised University Act of 2005, all universities have to establish their own systems of faculty assessment, and put them into practice. Based on the survey conducted in 2011, it is found that all of the universities in Taiwan have set up their own systems of faculty assessment. But because the Ministry of Education has no clear or unified rules about the implementation of the faculty assessment, each university, based on the principles of academic autonomy and the approval of the University Council, has the right to establish its own rules of the game related. It is also found that, in addition to the items of assessment are common to all universities, bound to the assessments of teaching, research, guidance and services, in accordance with the regulations of the University Act, the target groups of assessment, the criteria used for assessment, the cases of exemption, the frequency of assessment, and the university's responsive actions or treatments to the results of faculty assessment, etc. are quite different and diversified among universities in Taiwan.