| 閱讀全文 購買本期 | |
| 篇名 |
失眠認知行為自助方案對輪班員工的睡眠品質提升效果研究
|
|---|---|
| 並列篇名 | Effectiveness of the Cognitive Behavioral Self-Help Program for Insomnia on Improving Sleep Quality Among Shift Workers |
| 作者 | 吳岱蔚、吳珮瑀 |
| 中文摘要 | 研究目的:輪班工作的型態在現代職場有一定的普及性,隨之而來的是長期日夜顛倒所造成的失眠問題,這已成為影響輪班工作者健康和工作效率的重要議題。現有的失眠治療方法大多依賴藥物,不可避免會有副作用和依賴性的問題,需要更安全、效果持久且成本效益高的非藥物治療方案。本研究以自助式的失眠認知行為治療法作為初級治療的普及方式,期望能以最低成本支出,協助輪班工作者獲得有效的調節睡眠策略。研究方法:採用交叉實驗設計,從有輪班工作的大型企業中招募85位員工,進行8週失眠認知行為自助方案(CBT-I)。研究參與者隨機分為A組43人和B組42人,以ABBA程序進行實驗,在實驗開始、結束及結束後8週進行量表測量,測量指標為失眠嚴重度量表(ISI)、匹茲堡睡眠量表(PSQI)、簡式睡眠失功能信念及態度量表(DBAS-16)、一般自我效能量表(GSES)等,所用實驗材料為Refresh自助學習教材、睡眠日誌與及時回饋系統。研究結果:符合隨機分配原則的實驗組與對照組在ISI、PSQI、DBAS-16三個量表總分皆達顯著差異,但部分分量表未達顯著差異;合併兩實驗組後的實驗效果分析顯示,ISI、PSQI、DBAS-16三個量表的總分和分量表大部分與對照組達到顯著差異,只有安眠藥物使用,以及與藥物相關的睡眠信念分量表未達到顯著差異;在維持效果方面,實驗後8週的ISI、PSQI、DBAS-16三個量表的總分和分量表大部分與實驗後測之間無顯著差異,顯示實驗效果至8週後仍可維持,而日間功能干擾還有進一步改善的現象,此結果說明CBT-I是有效且可維持長時間療效的治療方法。研究結論:研究支持失眠認知行為自助方案搭配回饋機制對於輪班員工的睡眠品質有良好提升效果,未來值得在輪班工作族群推廣此方案。另外,建議後續研究可於不同行業、不同地區進行,以進一步了解此方案的適用性與限制。 |
| 英文摘要 | RESEARCH MOTIVATION AND PURPOSE
Prevalence of Shift Work and Associated Insomnia: ‧ Shift work is common in modern workplaces, where non-traditional hours disrupt the natural circadian rhythm. ‧ This disruption often leads to chronic sleep disturbances, significantly affecting both the health and work performance of employees. ‧ Insomnia among shift workers has become a critical issue, prompting the need
Limitations of Conventional Treatments: ‧ Most existing insomnia treatments rely on pharmacological approaches. Although medications can offer quick relief, they come with drawbacks such as side effects, dependency risks, and withdrawal issues. ‧ Long-term medication use is not ideal because of these adverse effects, making non-drug alternatives more appealing.
THE OBJECTIVES ‧ The study aimed to assess whether a self-help Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I) program could effectively improve sleep quality among shift workers. ‧ By delivering the intervention in an online, self-guided format, the study intended to provide a low-cost, easily accessible alternative that could reduce reliance on medications. ‧ The program was also designed to incorporate real-time feedback and selfmonitoring through sleep diaries, which might enhance adherence and personalize recommendations.
LITERATURE REVIEW Impact of Shift Work on Sleep: ‧ Shift workers often experience disrupted sleep patterns, including prolonged sleep onset, fragmented sleep, and lower sleep quality. ‧ Research from various regions (e.g., Taiwan, China, and Europe) shows that a substantial portion of the workforce engages in shift work, making insomnia a widespread issue. ‧ Poor sleep quality is linked to higher risks of chronic conditions such as hypertension, mental health issues, and metabolic disorders.
Comparison of Pharmacological and Non-Pharmacological Approaches: Pharmacotherapy: ‧ Medications like benzodiazepines and non-benzodiazepines are commonly prescribed; however, their use is limited by potential side effects, dependency, and guidelines that restrict long-term usage. ‧ Clinical recommendations suggest short-term use of hypnotics, usually no longer than 4 to 5 weeks.
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Insomnia (CBT-I): ‧ CBT-I is well-supported by evidence as an effective treatment for insomnia, capable of providing sustained improvements in sleep quality without the risks associated with medications. ‧ Traditional CBT-I involves stimulus control, sleep restriction, relaxation training, cognitive restructuring, and sleep hygiene education. ‧ Its effectiveness is further enhanced when tailored to address the specific sleep disturbances associated with shift work.
Rationale for a Self-Help Format: ‧ The shortage of trained professionals makes it challenging to deliver traditional CBT-I to all who need it, particularly in regions with limited mental health resources. ‧ Self-help CBT-I programs, like the “Refresh” module developed at Stanford, offer a practical solution. They provide structured materials covering key topics such as sleep stages, biological clocks, sleep restrictions, and cognitive strategies. ‧ Integrating automated feedback mechanisms and daily sleep diaries into the program allows for personalized guidance, potentially improving adherence and treatment outcomes.
RESEARCH METHODS Study Design and Participant Recruitment: ‧ A crossover experimental design (ABBA sequence) was employed to control for individual differences. ‧ Participants were recruited from a large factory in Shanghai operating a twoshift system (day and night shifts). ‧ Out of 125 initial recruits, 85 shift workers met the inclusion criteria (e.g., significant sleep onset delays and high scores on either the Insomnia Severity Index [ISI] or the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index [PSQI]). ‧ Exclusion criteria eliminated individuals with long-term medication use, substance abuse, significant medical conditions, or major psychiatric disorders.
Intervention Details: ‧ The eight-week intervention consisted of online self-help CBT-I modules (using the “Refresh” materials) covering: ➤ Education on sleep stages, the biological clock, and sleep regulation. ➤ Techniques include sleep restriction, stimulus control, relaxation training, mindfulness, and cognitive restructuring. ➤ Strategies for preventing relapse. ‧ Participants maintained a daily online sleep diary documenting sleep timings, latency, total sleep time, and perceived sleep quality. ‧ An automated feedback system provided rule-based recommendations (e.g., adjusting nap length or sleep times) based on diary inputs. ‧ The crossover design allowed one group to receive the intervention first while the other acted as a waiting-list control, and then switched roles.
MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENTS ‧ Insomnia Severity Index (ISI): Measures the intensity of insomnia symptoms and their impact. ‧ Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI): Assesses overall sleep quality, including subjective quality, sleep latency, and daytime dysfunction. ‧ Dysfunctional Beliefs and Attitudes about Sleep Scale (DBAS-16): Evaluates maladaptive beliefs regarding sleep. ‧ General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES): Gauges confidence in managing tasks and adhering to behavioral changes.
RESEARCH RESULTS Overall Improvements: ‧ Significant improvements were observed in the intervention group on the ISI, PSQI, and DBAS-16 total scores. ‧ Key sleep parameters such as sleep onset latency, efficiency, and overall sleep duration improved markedly. ‧ Enhanced daytime functioning was also reported, reflecting better overall sleep quality. Subscale Findings: ‧ Many subscales (e.g., subjective sleep quality, sleep duration) showed significant positive changes. ‧ However, subscales related to sleep medication use and medication-related beliefs did not change significantly—likely due to the exclusion of long-term medication users from the study.
Maintenance of Effects: ‧ Follow-up assessments at eight weeks post-intervention indicated that the improvements were maintained over time. ‧ The sustained benefits suggest that self-help CBT-I can offer durable improvements in sleep quality.
Dropout Analysis: ‧ Out of 85 participants, 63 completed the study while 21 dropped out. ‧ No significant differences were found between completers and dropouts in baseline sleep measures, although higher self-efficacy was linked with program completion. ‧ Common dropout reasons included the program’s perceived complexity and time demands rather than a lack of effectiveness.
DISCUSSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS Efficacy and Advantages: ‧ The study demonstrates that self-help CBT-I can significantly improve sleep quality among shift workers, reducing insomnia severity and correcting dysfunctional sleep beliefs. ‧ Its online delivery makes the program accessible, cost-effective, and adaptable to the irregular schedules of shift workers. ‧ The use of automated feedback and sleep diaries aids in personalizing treatment and enhancing participant engagement.
Challenges and Future Directions: ‧ Adherence: High dropout rates indicate that simplifying initial modules and incorporating motivational supports may help improve adherence. ‧ Customization: Future programs could benefit from tailoring content to individual needs and addressing specific beliefs about sleep medication. ‧ Extended Follow-Up: Longer follow-up periods are recommended to assess the durability of treatment effects. ‧ Broader Application: Testing the intervention across different industries and regions could confirm its generalizability and identify potential limitations.
Concluding Remarks: ‧ The study demonstrates that a self-help CBT-I program is a promising, cost effective, and sustainable intervention for improving sleep quality among shift workers. ‧ With refinements to address adherence challenges and further customization of content, such programs have the potential for broader implementation in diverse work settings. ‧ Ultimately, this approach emphasizes the value of non-pharmacological treatments in managing chronic sleep disturbances associated with modern work patterns. |
| 起訖頁 | 001-045 |
| 關鍵詞 | 失眠認知行為治療、交叉實驗設計、睡眠品質、輪班員工、cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia、crossover experimental design、sleep quality、shift workers |
| 刊名 | 教育與心理研究 |
| 期數 | 202512 (48:4期) |
| 出版單位 | 國立政治大學教育學院 |
| DOI |
|
| QR Code | |
該期刊 下一篇
| 技職校院高齡照顧系學生對高齡者態度、職業意向與學習幸福感之學習歷程研究—AIO整合照護與青銀共照體驗介入初探 |