青少年品味策略量表編製之研究

A Scale Development for Adolescents’ Savoring Strategies

本研究目的係為編製一份具信效度之青少年品味策略量表，並了解品味策略在相關背景因素的差異情形，以提供青少年助人工作者進行服務時，做為實務方面的評估或介入使用。本研究以在學國中生為研究參與對象，包含預試樣本104人，正式施測樣本604人，採問卷調查方式進行，進行青少年品味策略量表之編製。研究工具主要是以自編的品味策略為主，資料分析以項目分析、積差相關、因素分析、結構方程模式等統計方式進行分析。本研究所得結果如下：青少年品味策略量表包括擴展覺察10題，轉化亮點5題，共計15題。經量表信度考驗:在擴大覺察分量表上的內部一致性α值為.893，在轉化亮點分量表的α值為.865，而總量表之α值為.916，反映出本量表具有不錯之信度。在量表效度考驗之結果支持本量表之因素結構，反映出本量表具備不錯的建構效度。本量表並進行現況分析，結果顯示青少年感受到品味策略為中高程度，在擴大覺察為中高程度、轉化亮點量表為中等程度；背景變項差異考驗方面，本量表發現不同的性別在轉化亮點向度上有顯著差異，男生明顯高於女生，而其他變項在擴大向度與總量表沒有差異，另在年級向度上沒有差異。本篇研究根據研究所得結果，提出在輔導實務、及未來學術研究相關建議，供青少年工作者做為參考。

 

The study aimed to develop a reliable and valid scale, measuring adolescents’ savoring strategies and understanding the variation in the related background context, to serve as an instrument for assessment and intervention in professional helpers’ practices. For this purpose, questionnaire surveys were conducted on 104 and 604 in-school junior high school students as the pretest and the formal test. The researcher designed the scale with 15 items, 10 on perception expansion and 5 on highlight transformation. Collected data were analyzed statistically with item analysis, product-moment correlation, factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis of structural equation model, etc. The scale had a remarkable reliability, indicated by the coefficients of internal consistency of total scale (α = .916) and both perception expansion (α = .893) and highlight transformation (α = .865) subscales. On the other hand, the validity test also demonstrated good constructive validity, with the result supporting the scale’s factor structure. The A status quo analysis showed that adolescents had senses of savoring strategies at a medium- high level, perception expansion at a medium-high level, and highlight transformation at a medium level. Among background variables, different genders shared a significant difference in the highlight transformation subscale, with boys scoring significantly higher than girls, but had no difference in other expanding aspects and the whole scale. There were was also no difference among the grades. According to the findings, suggestions about practical application and further research were made for professional helpers for adolescents.