從Hirschi社會連結觀點探究學校因素對青少年吸菸行為之影響,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 黃光男  王善边  朱丽彬  崔雪娟  王美玲  黃乃熒  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文
篇名
從Hirschi社會連結觀點探究學校因素對青少年吸菸行為之影響
並列篇名
Influence of School Factors on Adolescent Smoking Behavior From the Perspective of Hirschi’s Social Bond Theory
作者 郭玲玲洪瑄董旭英
中文摘要
本研究欲從Hirschi社會連結觀點,探究學校因素對青少年吸菸行為之影響,以期補足菸害防制在制度與政策面之外,學校實務功能執行面之區塊。本研究利用「台灣青少年成長歷程研究」資料庫,樣本為1,668位高中職(含專科)學生,進行零膨脹負二項迴歸分析,檢視由學校因素所構成的連結,是否影響、如何影響青少年的吸菸行為。在考量性別和學校類型的脈絡效應後,青少年有無吸菸行為受到師生關係、大學或以上之教育承諾、請假天數,以及對吸菸持「當然錯」道德信念的影響。其中的師生關係、教育承諾與道德信念是保護因子,增加青少年無吸菸的機率。相對地,青少年在學校的請假天數,則降低青少年無吸菸的機率。另外,學校因素影響吸菸頻率(成癮程度)的假設,未能獲得本實徵研究的支持。最後,依據研究結果提出建議,以供學校、教師作為實際輔導工作及未來研究之參考。
英文摘要
Introduction

This study explored the impact of different school factors on adolescent smoking behavior from the perspective of Hirschi’s social bond theory. Hirschi proposed that social bonds restrain adolescents from deviant behavior. According to this theory, four elements constitute social bonds: attachment, involvement, commitment, and belief. Hirschi suggested that these bonds, such as attachment to teachers and peers, involvement in conventional activities, commitment to higher educational levels, and belief in moral values, reduce the likelihood of rules being broken.

According to the Global Youth Tobacco Survey (Health Promotion Administration [HPA], 2020), the smoking rate among high school students in Taiwan was 8.4% (12.7% for boys and 3.7% for girls). The HPA and Taiwan’s Ministry of Education have been promoting the Campus Smoke -Free Campaign since 2009. However, during the 2018-2019 academic year, an increase in the use of cigarettes among high school students was observed (HPA, 2020). Problems associated with cigarette use, such as cancer and addiction, are not uncommon, particularly among Taiwan’s adolescents.

This study examined the influence of different school factors on smoking behavior. Accordingly, we applied a zero-inflated negative binomial (ZINB) regression model to determine the appropriate distribution of data.

Methods

Using the Taiwan Youth Project (TYP) survey data and ZINB regression model, we simultaneously analyzed the impact of school factors on expected smokers and the frequency of cigarette smoking among adolescent smokers.

The TYP is a longitudinal study, and the baseline interview was conducted in 2000, with follow-up interviews being conducted annually until 2019. Only data obtained from the sixth wave of the project (2005) were used for this research. The final samples involved 1,668 high school (including vocational school) students, with 837 boys and 831 girls.

Smoking behavior was the dependent variable, and it was assessed using a 5-point rating scale (0 = “no smoking,” 4 = “always smoking”). For attachment, teacher-student relationships, peer relationships, and school belonging were selected as indicators. Measures of commitment included indicators of educational aspirations. Involvement included absenteeism and participation in school leadership and competitions. Finally, measures of belief included belief in the moral value of smoking. Gender and school types were included as control variables.

Results

Approximately 11.33% of the participants reported smoking at least once in the previous 30 days. A large percentage of the participants reported not smoking. The distribution for smoking data exhibited a high positive skew, with the variance exceeding the mean; this indicates that the outcome was overdispersed. ZINB models are designed for analyzing this type (excess zeros and overdispersion) of distribution under the assumption that the zeros originate from two latent subclasses.

The likelihood ratio for the full ZINB model was determined to be X2 (35) = 190.27 (p < .01; maximum likelihood = -770.76), indicating the significance of the overall model. Furthermore, the Vuong test for nonnested models supported the use of the ZINB model over a standard negative binomial model (z = 7.70, p < .01).

After controlling for the contextual effects of gender and school type, we observed that teacher–student relationships (β = .30, z = 3.16, OR = 1.35), educational aspirations (undergraduate degree: β = 1.06, z = 2.16, OR = 2.90; master’s degree: β = 1.35, z = 2.58, OR = 3.86; doctoral degree: β = 1.30, z = 2.52, OR = 3.68), and positive smoking moral values (β = 2.79, z = 2.05, OR = 16.29) had a significant positive influence on the zero-inflation probability (logit link). As expected, school absenteeism (β = -.41, z = -5.16, OR = 0.67) had a significant negative impact on the zero-inflation probability. However, for the negative binomial distribution (log link), we did not find evidence of school factors influencing the frequency of adolescent smoking behavior. Specifically, school factors were not significant predictors of the number of cigarettes consumed by the expected smokers.

Discussion

From the perspective of Hirschi’s social control theory, adolescents do not inherently conform to rules, and adherence to rules is accomplished through the formation of a social bond between the adolescent and conservative society.

When an adolescent has a healthy and strong relationship with their teacher, an emotional bond exists between them, influencing adolescent smoking behavior. Teachers serve to prevent students from breaking rules. However, in this study, peer attachment and a sense of school belonging did not exhibit any effect on smoking. Adolescents aspiring to study at university and attain a higher level of education were observed to be less likely to smoke. Involvement in school activities and assuming a student leadership position also had no impact on smoking behavior. Nevertheless, we observed that smoking was significantly associated with school absenteeism. Adolescents who are frequently absent from school are less likely to be attached to their teachers and school, and they are thus more likely to be engaged in smoking because they lack conventional social bonds. Finally, adolescents with positive moral values were noted to be less likely to smoke. Conventional moral values serve as a means to regulate social interactions. The results of this study demonstrate that boys are more likely to engage in smoking than girls. Furthermore, vocational high school and junior college students are more likely to become cigarette users than high school students.

The study results highlight the impact of school factors on expected adolescent smokers and on the frequency of cigarette consumption among adolescent smokers. When school factors were tested solely against smoking behaviors, the results demonstrate that teacher-student relationships, educational aspirations, and positive moral values prevented adolescents from adopting smoking behavior. However, we observed school absenteeism to have a negative effect on smoking behavior. The effects of school factors on the frequency of cigarette smoking among adolescents were nonsignificant.

This study has several limitations that should be noted. First, the study relied on secondary data that were collected with a focus on traditional cigarettes. Using up-to-date data to conduct a comprehensive assessment of the effect of school factors on the use of e-cigarettes would benefit future research. Second, although this study demonstrated social bonds to be associated with smoking behavior, the causal association between them is still unclear. A longitudinal survey is required to examine the nature and direction of this association.

Sustained efforts to implement laws to control and prevent cigarette use are crucial for reducing and regulating smoking among Taiwan’s adolescents.

起訖頁 103-132
關鍵詞 青少年吸菸行為社會連結學校因素adolescent smoking behaviorsocial bondschool factors
刊名 教育科學研究期刊  
期數 202112 (66:4期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學
DOI 10.6209/JORIES.202112_66(4).0004    複製DOI
QR Code
該期刊
上一篇
臺灣青少年毒品犯罪率之數量分析—家庭結構與娛樂因素之影響
該期刊
下一篇
應用解構式計畫行為理論探討高中學生對3D虛擬實境反毒課程使用意圖之質性研究

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500