閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
学习判断的练习伴随低估效应
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Underconfidence-with-Pratice Effect for Judgments of Learning |
作者 | 贾宁、白学军 |
中文摘要 | 学习判断是元认知判断的一种重要形式,是个体对随后的记忆成绩的预测。当个体在多次学习-测验任务中学习词对时,学习判断出现了练习伴随低估效应。研究者对此进行了大量的实验并提出了多种理论,如线索应用模型,提取流畅性假说和基点-校正假说。但是,Koriat等人通过分析发现练习伴随低估效应可能不是单一因素作用的结果,而是多种效应共同影响作用的表现,并由此提出了记忆去偏差假说。文章指出了目前研究中还存在的问题以及未来研究的方向。 |
英文摘要 | As an important metacognitive judgment, judgment of learning (JOL) is the prediction about future performance of learned materials. JOLs made during multiple study-test trials underestimate increases in recall performance across those trials, an effect that has been dubbed the underconfidence-with-practice (UWP) effect. Based on lots of experiment results, several theoretical explanations for UWP effect have been proposed, such as cue-utilization model, retrieval-fluency hypothesis, and anchoring-and-adjustment account. But, Koriat et al (2006) found these results did not point to a single mechanism that could account for the occurrence of the UWP effect, which suggesting that this effect might be multiply determined. Thus, they proposed a mnemonic debiasing account. The limitations of the precious studies and the suggestions for future research are put forward. |
起訖頁 | 429-435 |
關鍵詞 | 学习判断、练习伴随低估效应、产生机制、judgment of learning、UWP effect、mechanism |
刊名 | 心理科學進展 |
期數 | 200705 (15:3期) |
出版單位 | 中國科學院心理研究所;中國心理學會 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 儿童早期词汇获得的词类差异 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 心理理论和语言发展的关系 |