中国比较教育研究参与国际对话的方略选择

The Participating Strategy of Chinese Comparative Education Research in International Dialogue

中国比较教育研究在国际学术交流中表现出研究主题的”去中国化”、”交流话语的”亲汉语化”、研究方法的”转定量化”，此类集体语微的表现令人担忧。中国比较教育研究应该如何参与国际对话？在国际对话中究意担当怎样的使命？恰当处理中国比较教育研究中的天上与地下（理论与实践）、祖先与嗣后（历史与现实）、城内与城外（国内与国际）、宏大与精小（宏观与微观）等几对范畴，实现二者关系的合理超越成为中国比较教育研究的理性追求，尊重”取”的前提下，适当的”予”成为中国比较教育研究在国际对话中的使命诉求。

It is of great concern on the collective weak voice referring to the inclinations that China’s comparative education research shows in international academic exchange， namely ， “de─Chinese” in research topic， “pro─Chinese” in communication language and “despising quantitative analysis” in research method. How should China’s comparative education research participate in the international dialogue？What mission should it assume？It is a rational quest to deal with several relationships in a proper way， such as theory and practice， history and present；domestic and international；macro and micro， and to reach the reasonable surpassing of the relations of the pairs. It is the mission pursuit of china’s comparative education research that “to give“ moderately premises on “to take” in the international dialogue.