我國大學教育評鑑之研究,ERICDATA高等教育知識庫
高等教育出版
熱門: 崔雪娟  黃光男  朱丽彬  王美玲  王善边  黃乃熒  
高等教育出版
首頁 臺灣期刊   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   大陸/海外期刊   政府機關   學校系所   學協會   民間出版   DOI註冊服務
閱讀全文
篇名
我國大學教育評鑑之研究
作者 呂美員
中文摘要
一九六○年代後期及一九七○年代前期為世界各國高等教育發展的重要階段。在此階段中有二明顯的趨勢:一為大學院校學生人數大量增加;另一為高等教育的課程,教育目標隨社會、經濟的結構及需要有明顯的更革,而非僅墨守傳統學院的體制。
英文摘要
Evaluation is served to monitor and improve the quality of educational system. This paper discuses the higher educational evaluation in Republic of China and proposes some suggestions to enhance the whole process of evaluation.At first, this study investigated the theory of evaluation, and the practice of educational evaluation implemented in the United States. Then, two sets of questionnaire for survey on higher educational evaluation were developed, one for teacher and the other one for evaluator. The sample of the survey consisted of 1680 college teachers and 318 experienced evaluators. Those sampled data were analyzed by the techniques of Z test, Spearman Rank Correlation and Kai Square Test.The findings and suggestions are as follows:\r1.It is essential to carry out the evaluation process of higher education.2.There are two objectives served by evaluation, the first one is to encourage each college or university set by its own idea, the other one is to provide all information and results for decision making authority.3.The evaluation task had better be carried out by the Ministry of Education, and a permanent organization is proposed to be set up in charge of this job.The evaluator should be selected at discreet. Teaching experience, analyzing and judging ability should be emphasized.5.The criteria of evaluation have not been set up. The criteria is proposed to be set up as guidance.6.General speaking, the faculties of those evaluated schools pay much attention to the evaluation task, in which, private school is better than public school. Besides, each school needs to improve its own self─study task.7.The structure and the process of handing for evaluation report need to be improved.8.The evaluation result had better be open to public.9.The evaluation result should be used as a reference for government financial aid.10.Afrer implementing the evaluation practice, the quality of faculty of each school has evaluation practice, the quality of faculty of each school has been greatly improved, and the other aspects of school education also receive some impact but not so significant.Based on these facts, we are sure that the evaluation with gradually improve the qualily of education in our country.
起訖頁 227-239
刊名 教育研究集刊  
期數 198306 (25期)
出版單位 國立臺灣師範大學教育學系
該期刊
上一篇
課程研究的「第三勢力」:美國「再概念化」學派課程理論的評介
該期刊
下一篇
臺灣省高中高職入學方式之研究

高等教育知識庫  閱讀計畫  教育研究月刊  新書優惠  

教師服務
合作出版
期刊徵稿
聯絡高教
高教FB
讀者服務
圖書目錄
教育期刊
訂購服務
活動訊息
數位服務
高等教育知識庫
國際資料庫收錄
投審稿系統
DOI註冊
線上購買
高點網路書店 
元照網路書店
博客來網路書店
教育資源
教育網站
國際教育網站
關於高教
高教簡介
出版授權
合作單位
知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達 知識達
版權所有‧轉載必究 Copyright2011 高等教育文化事業股份有限公司  All Rights Reserved
服務信箱:edubook@edubook.com.tw 台北市館前路 26 號 6 樓 Tel:+886-2-23885899 Fax:+886-2-23892500