主體、無、荒謬──從李喬的「反抗哲學」論《藍彩霞的春天》

Subject, Nothingness, Absurdity: The Research of Lee Chou’s Novel“The Spring of Lan Tsai-Shea”on the Basis of the Philosophy of Resistance

本文討論李喬的「反抗哲學」以及長篇小說《藍彩霞的春天》如何將反抗哲學小說化、戲劇化。李喬的「反抗哲學」藉由物理學、天文學說明天體的「作用力」、「反作用力」的平衡，推源「反抗」作為形上根源，下貫於人，「反抗」是人與生俱來的本質。再根據西方存在主義哲學家沙特、卡謬的「荒謬、無、主體覺醒」哲學觀念為基礎，說明現代人因襲一成不變的制度、習慣，失去自我意識，對於一切現象無知覺，陷入無價值的「虛無」。因此，存在主義強調主體覺醒，能夠意識自我與現象界之間的各種矛盾，產生的荒謬感、虛無。如果主體覺醒之後，在主體自由情況下，抉擇自我的行為與命運，才是真正完成主體的建構。《藍彩霞的春天》架構存在主義的無、荒謬、主體，描寫藍彩霞被置身的道德倫理墮落、社會公義淪喪的台灣社會，對照原先認知的公平正義，形成現實各種價值矛盾的荒謬感；等到放棄抵抗認同妓院的體制、自我放逐，陷入虛無，直到意識失去任何意義的荒謬，自我覺醒，起身反抗自我的虛無與荒謬。

This paper is to discuss the philosophy of resistance and the novel “The Springof Lan Tsai- Shea”. The philosophy of resistance was based on the existentialism,the resistance meant the balance of power, is the meta-physical sauce of everything,like Plato’s ‘the theory of forms.’ Everyone was endowed with essence of resistance.People must face nothingness without self-consciousness, and absurdity formed bythe conflicts between myself and phenome nous, erected the subject of resistance.“The Spring of Lan Tsai- Shea” was constructed with nothingness, absurdity,subject; describing Lan Tsai- Shea giving up struggling and fallen into prosecutorsystem and nothingness. Until she came to consciousness of herself, decided to fightand erect subject.