臺灣高等教育評鑑制度的實務探究

An Empirical Study on the Evaluation System for Higher Education in Taiwan

近年來，高等教育評鑑事務已成為顯學，尤其隨著結合認可制與退場機制，我們可以感受透過評鑑機制的啟動，達到追求更高的高等教育品質，本文即是從該角度進行論述，並輔以提問與回應方式，進行對現階段國內高等教育評鑑制度的交互評論，期望能更加落實評鑑制度，以提升教育品質。\r評鑑過程必須針對組織核心價值與其核心目的進行檢視，會直接帶動組織成員的全體共識與確認願景落實的積極策略。是故，評鑑的積極功能乃能促動全體員工的熱情凝聚，其更需要融入組織領導階層價值觀、高層主管對於外界環境認知與回應態度，以形成透過評鑑積極改善的組織文化、進而真正達到組織全體成員的參與及共識。換言之，透過落實評鑑制度的執行功能與積極目標，形成組織成員對未來發展所共同擁有的夢想與抱持的企圖。\r本文首先提出探究我國實施大學評鑑和世界主要國家對大學的評鑑方式有無差異？有無自我特色，進而討論大學評鑑的辦理單位最難以克服的問題為何？以及大學校院會以何種態度看待評鑑？這是從高等教育評鑑制度的如何評鑑層面導入評鑑制度的論述，並針對當前進行評鑑工作常見的技術缺失為何？評鑑的時間以多長為最適合？論述評鑑對學校產生之效益如何？最後本文以提出評鑑三化（超文化、最適化、後設化）之行動策略做為本文建言並代結論。

With the combination of accreditation and exiting mechanism， the evaluation of the higher education has gained its popularity these years. We witness ourselves the consequence of the start-up of the evaluation system， which is aimed at pursuing a good quality of our higher education. From this angle， this treatise initiates a series of intra-commentary on the present domestic evaluation systems of the higher education in Taiwan. In dialogue with one another， we are looking forward to the improvement of the quality of the present-existed educational system.The central value and purpose of the organization should be clearly examined in the process of evaluation， which may bring up collective consensus among the faculty members of the entire organization and speed up the implementation of an effective strategy – to usher in a promising future for our universities and colleges. Therefore， one of the positive functionalities of evaluation of evaluation is to boost and coagulate morale of the entire staff members. Most of all， the top brass of the school with such perceptions and attitudes towards external circumstances is highly constructive in the formation of a well-organized college community via a string of evaluations. Put it in another words， the practice of evaluation can enrich the administration function and further， transform the organizational vision.From the outset， this essay intends to probe the differentiation of the ways of evaluation adopted in Taiwan by the existing universities and colleges and those in the mainstream universities around the world. Do they have their irreplaceable uniqueness? Then this further the question about the issue that for the agencies involved what is the most tough stuff in dealing with college evaluation and how do the leader of our universities think of the evaluation system. In the meantime， what are the frequent occurred technical imperfections in the introduction of such an evaluation system for the higher education remains our major concerns. Is the length of evaluation adequate? In sum up， the essay concludes with the question that what are the resulting benefits sprang from the evaluation system for universities and colleges in the long run.