比較傳統式、TRX 懸吊式與複合式阻力訓練對大專排球選手運動能力及表現之影響

Comparison effectiveness of the traditional resistance training, TRX suspension training, and Combined TRX and traditional training on athletic ability and performance in collegiate volleyball players

目的 : 本研究旨在探討 8週傳統式、懸吊式或複合式阻力訓練對大專排球選手運動能力及表現之影響。方法 : 研究設計係採介入性研究。受試者為天主教輔仁大學 32 名排球選手採分層隨機方式分為三組：傳統式阻力訓練組 (TRT 組，n = 12)、懸吊式阻力訓練組 (TRX 組，n = 11) 及複合式阻力訓練組 (CT 組，n = 9)。TRT 組實施 8週，每週 2天傳統式阻力訓練，運動強度採漸進原則 1-4週其負荷強度為 50%-60% 1-RM (one-repetition maximum)；5-8週其負荷強度為 60%-70% 1-RM，每組反覆次數 15次，每次訓練 3組。TRX 組實施 8週，每週 2天懸吊式阻力訓練，每次實施 10個動作項目，每個動作進行 30秒，運動強度採漸進原則每週每種動作時間增加 10秒。CT 組實施 8週，每週 2天複合式阻力訓練 (傳統式與懸吊式阻力訓練各1天)。本研究於第 0週及 8週進行問卷調查、體脂肪率測量、身體質量指數、運動能力及表現之檢測。結果 : 本研究結果發現 8週傳統式、懸吊式或複合式阻力訓練介入前、後，分別對大專排球選手握力、臥舉、深蹲、垂直跳高度與動力等運動能力具有顯著的改善；殺球速度與準確度等運動表現具有顯著的改善，但在發球速度運動表現卻是顯著降低。結論 : 三種不同模式阻力訓練介入對大專排球選手僅在握力的改善效果，複合式阻力訓練顯著優於傳統式或 TRX 懸吊式阻力訓練；運動表現的改善效果並無顯著之差別。

 

Purpose: The aim of this study was to determine which type of resistance training is more effective in improving athletic ability and performance in collegiate volleyball players. Methods: A total of 32 collegiate volleyball players, aged 18-23 years old, were randomized into three groups: a traditional resistance training group (TRT, n = 12), a TRX suspension resistance training group (TRX, n = 11), and a combined TRX suspension and traditional resistance training group (CRT, n = 9). Results: After 8-week of exercise program, the questionnaire variables, anthropometrics, athletic ability and performance were compared with the data obtained at the baseline. The results showed that with the data obtained at the baseline as the comparator, the effects of TRT, TRX and CRT were positively associated with improvement in athletic ability and performance after 8-week of exercise program. Conclusion: Our findings suggested that a short-term exercise program can play an important role in improving the athletic ability and performance, but the improvements are non-significant difference with TRT, TRX, and CRT.