短期補習班全日容留六歲以下幼兒及經營類似幼兒園教保服務適法性之研究

A Study on the Legitimacy of Child Care provision of Short-term Tutorial Centers

近年來部分短期補習班全日容留六歲以下幼兒及經營類似幼兒園教保服務，甚至以幼兒園名義招生，造成幼兒家長混淆。本研究首先探究短期補習班招收六歲以下幼兒之適法性。其次，分析短期補習班經營類似幼兒園教保服務之適法性。本研究之研究結論如下：（一）現行補習及進修教育法並未限制短期補習班全日容留六歲以下幼兒；（二）短期補習班經營類似幼兒園教保服務應以補習及進修教育法裁處，不得依幼兒教育及照顧法裁處。根據結論，提出之建議如下：（一）修正補習及進修教育法相關規定，限制短期補習班全日容留六歲以下幼兒；（二）落實補習及進修教育法相關規定，速令短期補習班恢復原設立許可之業務；（三）訂定地方自治條例罰則規定，遏止短期補習班經營類似幼兒園教保服務。

Recently some short-term tutorial centers have begun to both offer fulltime child care provision for children under six years and manage preschool-like educare services， and even recruit young children in the preschool sector， which has resulted in some confusion among parents. This study explores the legitimacy of provision offered by short-term tutorial centers Furthermore， this study analyzes the legitimacy of short-term tutorial centers managing preschool-like educare services. The findings of this study are as follows: 1. The existing Supplementary Education Act does not prohibit short-term tutorial centers from taking care of young children under six years old full-time; 2. in accordance with the Supplementary Education Act， short-term tutorial centers managing preschool-like educare services should be penalized， but not in accordance with the Early Childhood Education and Care Act. Based on the findings， this study offered the following suggestions: 1. adapting the Supplementary Education Act to prohibit short-term tutorial centers from taking care of young children under six years old full-time; 2. implementing a Supplementary Education Act to rehabilitate the establishment of business permit; 3. establishing penal provisions in local self-government ordinances to prohibit short-term tutorial centers from managing preschool-like educare services.