閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
「實在論的心理學」與「主體的辯證」
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Psychology of Realism and Dialectic of Subjectivity |
作者 | 黃光國 |
中文摘要 | 針對李維倫與葉光輝對於我撰寫之「靶子論文」所作的評論,本文逐一作出回應:「多元哲學典範」並非意指:每位研究者均可依照自己的目的,採用不同的哲學典範,來從事研究。它是我為了建構「含攝文化的理論」,而發展出來的一套既定的研究程序,這樣的研究成果可以利用來發展更多「含攝文化的理論」,卻很難加以複製。更清楚地說,這種研究取徑可以幫助在「儒家文化區」從事研究工作的學術社群認清其「知識論主體」。一位社會科學工作者以自己的「視域」為基礎,對我的研究成果進行辯證性的詮釋,進而建構其「含攝文化的理論」,則可能完成其學術的個別主體。 |
英文摘要 | In responding to the comments on my “Target Article” made by Prof. Lee &Yeh, this paper emphasizes that “multiple philosophical paradigms” does not mean that every researcher may follow any philosophical paradigm to accomplish the academic goal of his/her research works. It is a particular procedure of research which I used to construct culture-inclusive theories of psychology. My academic performance might be utilized to develop more culture-inclusive theories in a variety of domains, but it is very hard to replicate it. This approach my help the scientific community of Confucian cultural zone to recognize their epistemological subjectivity. If a researcher decides to construct his/her horizon, S/he might accomplish his/her personal subjectivity. |
起訖頁 | 097-108 |
關鍵詞 | 多元哲學典範、含攝文化的理論、知識論主體、個別主體、multiple philosophical paradigms、culture-inclusive theory、epistemology subjectivity、personal subjectivity |
刊名 | 輔導與諮商學報 |
期數 | 201511 (37:2期) |
出版單位 | 國立彰化師範大學輔導與諮商學系 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 多重哲學典範:彈性運用還是發展過程? |