从西方学界的争鸣看后现代课程的\＂概念重建运动＂

On the “Reconceptualization Movement”from the Western Academic Debates

西方课程论发展的困境引发了后现代课程的“概念重建运动”，也点燃了重建主义 和传统主义之间的学术争鸣。本文通过梳理和分析21世纪以来传统主义和重建主义的三次交 锋，得出结论：西方课程论发展的困境实质是研究者自身的困境；“概念重建运动”没有解决问 题，而是逃避了问题。我国课程论不应效仿西方后现代课程的“概念重建运动”，而是要扎根课 程开发的实践，努力研究和开发出更高效的学校课程。

At the second half of the twentieth century， the predicaments of western curriculum theory caused the ureconceptualization movement， which ignited academic curriculum debate between reconceptualistand traditionalist. Through combing and analysis of debate since 21st century， the article draws a conclusion: the essence of predicament in western curriculum theory is the curricularistfs predicament; the ＂reconceptualization movement＂ did not solve the problem，but avoiding the problem， Chinese curriculum theory should not follow the concept of ＂reconceptualization＂，but taking rooted in curriculum development and making great effort to develop the most appropriate school course for the students^ growth.