閱讀全文 | |
篇名 |
上海市高校2001-2012年国际合作论文分析
|
---|---|
並列篇名 | Internationally Co-authored Papers Published by Shanghai-based Universities for the Period of 2001-2012: A Bibliometric Analysis |
作者 | 余新丽 |
中文摘要 | 以上海高校2001-2012 年的国际合作论文为研究对象,对上海高校及其各学科的国际合作论文 数、国际合作率、总被引次数、篇均被引次数、国际合作指数、相对引文影响力等进行分析,探析上海高校国 际科技合作的产出和影响力。结果表明:2001-2012 年上海高校国际合作论文的数量和国际合作率呈现持 续增长的态势,其中上海交通大学的国际合作论文最多,华东师范大学的国际合作率最高;上海高校的国际 合作指数高于世界平均水平,相对影响力低于世界平均水平;上海高校的城乡规划学、心理学、地理学、工商 管理、公共卫生与预防医学、公共管理、地质学、图书情报与档案管理、林学、天文学等54 个学科的国际合作 指数高于世界平均水平,建筑学、数学、动力工程及工程热物理、护理学、材料科学与工程、轻工技术与工程 等6 个学科的相对影响力高于世界平均水平。 |
英文摘要 | Internationally co -authored paper is an important indicator of international scientific and technological cooperation. The author performs a bibliometric analysis of internationally co -authored papers published by Shanghai -based universities for the period of 2001 -2012, based on the InCites database. Key indicators consist of quantity of internationally co-authored papers, international collaboration rate, overall citation rate, citation rate per paper, international collaboration index, and relative citation impact. The findings are summarized as follows: For the period of 2001-2012, the quantity and percentage of internationally co-authored papers published by Shanghai-based universities continued to increase. Shanghai Jiao Tong University accounted for the largest number of internationally co-authored papers, while East China Normal University accounted for the highest international cooperation rate. The ICI of Shanghai-based universities was higher than the world average, while their RCI was lower than the world average. The ICI of fifty-four disciplines in Shanghai-based universities were higher than the world average, while the RCI of six disciplines in Shanghai-based universities were greater than the world average. |
起訖頁 | 066-070 |
關鍵詞 | 国际合作论文、国际合作率、国际合作指数、相对引文影响力、Internationally Co-authored Paper、International Cooperation Rate、International Cooperation Index |
刊名 | 復旦教育論壇 |
期數 | 201505 (13:3期) |
出版單位 | 復旦大學 |
該期刊 上一篇
| 我国科研经费预算制度的问题与改革———与美国比较的视角 |
該期刊 下一篇
| 中国大陆学生的中外合作办学选择———基于信息策略的实证研究 |